Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38680019›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2024

Comparative electroencephalography analysis: Marathon runners during tapering versus sedentary controls reveals no significant differences.

J Moussiopoulou, M Handrack-Bonnet, B Pross, O Pogarell, D Keeser, M Halle, P Falkai, J Scherr, A Hasan, A Roeh

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

J Moussiopoulou *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0157-6197
M Handrack-Bonnet *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
B ProssDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
O PogarellDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
D KeeserDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
M HalleDepartment of Prevention and Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany.
P FalkaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
J ScherrDepartment of Prevention and Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany.
A HasanMedical Faculty, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
A RoehMedical Faculty, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

Munich Germany
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrevious studies described various adaptive neuroplastic brain changes associated with physical activity (PA). EEG studies focused mostly on effects during or shortly after short bouts of exercise. This is the first study to investigate the capability of EEG to display PA-induced long-lasting plasticity in runners compared to a sedentary control group.

methodsThirty trained runners and 30 age- and sex-matched sedentary controls (SC) were included as a subpopulation of the ReCaP (Running effects on Cognition and Plasticity) study. PA was measured with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Resting-state EEG of the runners was recorded in the tapering phase of the training for the Munich marathon 2017. Power spectrum analyses were conducted using standardized low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) and included the following frequency bands: delta: 1.5-6 Hz, theta: 6.5-8.0 Hz, alpha1: 8.5-10 Hz, alpha2: 10.5-12.0 Hz, beta1: 12.5-18.0 Hz, beta2: 18.5-21.0 Hz, beta3: 21.5-30.0 Hz, and total power (1.5-30 Hz).

resultsPA (IPAQ) and BMI differed significantly between the groups. The other included demographic parameters were comparable. Statistical nonparametric mapping showed no significant power differences in EEG between the groups. DISCUSSION: Heterogeneity in study protocols, especially in time intervals between exercise cessation and EEG recordings and juxtaposition of acute exercise-induced effects on EEG in previous studies, could be possible reasons for the differences in results. Future studies should record EEG at different time points after exercise cessation and in a broader spectrum of exercise intensities and forms to further explore the capability of EEG in displaying long-term exercise-induced plasticity.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyMarathon RunningSedentary BehaviorAdultBrainExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuronal PlasticityRunningEEGmarathonphysical activityplasticityrunning

Identifiers

PMID38680019
PMCPMC11056696

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.