ReviewACS omega2024
Biophysical Assays for Investigating Modulators of Macromolecular Complexes: An Overview.
Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Computational Chemistry Approaches in Modern Drug Discovery: Advances in Docking, Pharmacophore Modeling, Molecular Dynamics, and Virtual Screening.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- HuR-Targeted Small Molecules ReduceInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Molecular dynamics simulations of proteins: an in-depth review of computational strategies, structural insights, and their role in medicinal chemistry and drug development.Biological cybernetics · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug discovery is a lengthy and intricate process, and in its early stage, crucial steps are the selection of the therapeutic target and the identification of novel ligands. Most targets are dysregulated in pathogenic cells; typically, their activation or deactivation leads to the desired effect, while in other cases, interfering with the target-natural binder complex achieves the therapeutic results. Biophysical assays are a suitable strategy for finding new ligands or interferent agents, being able to evaluate ligand-protein interactions and assessing the effect of small molecules (SMols) on macromolecular complexes. This mini-review provides a detailed analysis of widely used biophysical methods, including fluorescence-based approaches, circular dichroism, isothermal titration calorimetry, microscale thermophoresis, and NMR spectroscopy. After a brief description of the methodologies, examples of interaction and competition experiments are described, together with an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each technique. This mini-review provides an overview of the most relevant biophysical technologies that can help in identifying SMols able not only to bind proteins but also to interfere with macromolecular complexes.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.