ArticleHeliyon2024
Cross-platform gene expression profiling of breast cancer: Exploring the relationship between breast cancer grades and gene expression pattern.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioinformatics analysis of IFI6 as a novel prognostic biomarker and its correlation with immune infiltration in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Profiling mRNA and miRNA expression variations associated with cyclin-dependent kinase pathway in the low-grade luminal early breast cancer.Journal of applied genetics · 2025Article
- A new insight into the impact of copy number variations on cell cycle deregulation of luminal-type breast cancer.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene expression profiling is a powerful tool that has been extensively used to investigate the underlying biology and etiology of diseases, including cancer. Microarray gene expression analysis enables simultaneous measurement of thousands of mRNA levels. Sophisticated computational approaches have evolved in parallel with the rapid progress in bioassay technologies, enabling more effective analysis of the large and complex datasets that these technologies produce. In this study, we utilized systems biology approaches to examine gene expression profiles across different grades of breast cancer progression. We conducted a meta-analysis of publicly available microarray data to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying breast cancer grade classification. Our results suggest that while grade index is commonly used for evaluating cancer progression status in the clinic, the complexity of molecular mechanisms, histological characteristics, and other factors related to patient outcomes raises doubts about the utility of breast cancer grades as a foundation for formulating treatment protocols. Our study underscores the importance of advancing personalized strategies for breast cancer classification and management. More research is crucial to refine diagnostic tools and treatment modalities, aiming for greater precision and tailored care in patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.