ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2024
Clinical practice guidelines for nutritional assessment and monitoring of adult ICU patients in China.
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Nutritional Risk Screening Recommendations for Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Research Study and Quality Appraisal of Clinical Guidelines.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence of disease related malnutrition assessed by NRS2002, STAMP, MNA-SF, one-step and two-step GLIM at admission and discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Integrated Assessment of Sarcopenia in Patients with Gastric Cancer Using Deep Learning and Radiomics.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Article
- Development and Interpretability Analysis of a Stacking Ensemble Model for Early Prediction of Nutritional Risk in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- External validation of the feeding intolerance prediction model (NOFI) in critically ill patients: A post hoc analysis of a large-scale randomized controlled trial.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- The "cytokine storm" in infection and sepsis: win the battle but lose the war.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- The role of cytokines in acute gastrointestinal injury: a prospective pilot study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advancements in research on feeding intolerance to enteral nutrition in neurocritical patients undergoing sedation and analgesia.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Continuous peptide-based versus sequential standard polymeric enteral nutrition formula in critically ill patients with acute gastrointestinal injury: study protocol for a single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of the gastrointestinal dysfunction score versus acute gastrointestinal injury grade for short-term risk stratification in critically ill patients: evidence from two prospective cohorts.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Impact of nutritional screening on mortality and intensive care unit length of stay.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- The hockey-stick association of energy supply in the first 72 h of critical illness may apply only to patients with a normal body mass index: aFrontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of four nutritional scores in predicting delirium in ICU patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Chinese Society of Critical Care Medicine (CSCCM) has developed clinical practice guidelines for nutrition assessment and monitoring for patients in adult intensive care units (ICUs) in China. This guideline focuses on nutrition evaluation and metabolic monitoring to achieve optimal and personalized nutrition therapy for critically ill patients. This guideline was developed by experts in critical care medicine and evidence-based medicine methodology and was developed after a thorough review of the system and a summary of relevant trials or studies published from 2000 to July 2023. A total of 18 recommendations were formed and consensus was reached through discussions and reviews by expert groups in critical care medicine, parenteral and enteral nutrition, and surgery. The recommendations are based on currently available evidence and cover several key fields, including screening and assessment, evaluation and assessment of enteral feeding intolerance, metabolic and nutritional measurement and monitoring during nutrition therapy, and organ function evaluation related to nutrition supply. Each question was analyzed according to the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) principle. In addition, interpretations were provided for four questions that did not reach a consensus but may have potential clinical and research value. The plan is to update this nutrition assessment and monitoring guideline using the international guideline update method within 3-5 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.