Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684088›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2024

The Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Assessing Fall Risk: Systematic Review.

Ana González-Castro, Raquel Leirós-Rodríguez, Camino Prada-García, José Alberto Benítez-Andrades

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The potential of artificial intelligence in clinical trials.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana González-CastroNursing and Physical Therapy Department, Universidad de León, Ponferrada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7999-4017
Raquel Leirós-Rodríguez *SALBIS Research Group, Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Universidad de León, Ponferrada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7502-7644
Camino Prada-GarcíaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2487-9350
José Alberto Benítez-AndradesSALBIS Research Group, Department of Electric, Systems and Automatics Engineering, Universidad de León, León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4450-349X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalls and their consequences are a serious public health problem worldwide. Each year, 37.3 million falls requiring medical attention occur. Therefore, the analysis of fall risk is of great importance for prevention. Artificial intelligence (AI) represents an innovative tool for creating predictive statistical models of fall risk through data analysis.

objectiveThe aim of this review was to analyze the available evidence on the applications of AI in the analysis of data related to postural control and fall risk.

methodsA literature search was conducted in 6 databases with the following inclusion criteria: the articles had to be published within the last 5 years (from 2018 to 2024), they had to apply some method of AI, AI analyses had to be applied to data from samples consisting of humans, and the analyzed sample had to consist of individuals with independent walking with or without the assistance of external orthopedic devices.

resultsWe obtained a total of 3858 articles, of which 22 were finally selected. Data extraction for subsequent analysis varied in the different studies: 82% (18/22) of them extracted data through tests or functional assessments, and the remaining 18% (4/22) of them extracted through existing medical records. Different AI techniques were used throughout the articles. All the research included in the review obtained accuracy values of >70% in the predictive models obtained through AI.

conclusionsThe use of AI proves to be a valuable tool for creating predictive models of fall risk. The use of this tool could have a significant socioeconomic impact as it enables the development of low-cost predictive models with a high level of accuracy.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42023443277; https://tinyurl.com/4sb72ssv.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsArtificial IntelligenceHumansPostural BalanceRisk Assessmentaccidental fallsAIartificial intelligencefall riskmachine learningpatient carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID38684088
PMCPMC11091813

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.