Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684331›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2024

Distributional imputation for the analysis of censored recurrent events.

Sarah R Fairfax, Shu Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah R FairfaxDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-0124-2165
Shu YangDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7703-707X

Funding

Transforming Clinical Trials for Elderly and Rare Cancers through Intelligent and Robust Information BorrowingR01AG066883 · NIA · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Xiaofei Wang, Shu Yang · 2020 to 2026
$2.0M
Spatial Causal Inference for Wildland Fire Smoke Effects on Air Pollution and HealthR01ES031651 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI REICH, BRIAN J., YANG, SHU · 2020 to 2024
$1.2M
National Science Foundation SES 2242776NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066883NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES031651NIH HHS 1R01AG066883NIH HHS 1R01ES031651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal clinical trials for which recurrent events endpoints are of interest are commonly subject to missing event data. Primary analyses in such trials are often performed assuming events are missing at random, and sensitivity analyses are necessary to assess robustness of primary analysis conclusions to missing data assumptions. Control-based imputation is an attractive approach in superiority trials for imposing conservative assumptions on how data may be missing not at random. A popular approach to implementing control-based assumptions for recurrent events is multiple imputation (MI), but Rubin's variance estimator is often biased for the true sampling variability of the point estimator in the control-based setting. We propose distributional imputation (DI) with corresponding wild bootstrap variance estimation procedure for control-based sensitivity analyses of recurrent events. We apply control-based DI to a type I diabetes trial. In the application and simulation studies, DI produced more reasonable standard error estimates than MI with Rubin's combining rules in control-based sensitivity analyses of recurrent events.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationBiasClinical Trials as TopicData Interpretation, StatisticalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansLongitudinal StudiesModels, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrencecontrol‐based imputationdistributional imputationintercurrent eventsrecurrent eventssensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID38684331
PMCPMC11327775

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.