Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684860›Full record

Trial reportNature medicine2024

AI-enabled electrocardiography alert intervention and all-cause mortality: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.

Chin-Sheng Lin, Wei-Ting Liu, Dung-Jang Tsai, Yu-Sheng Lou, Chiao-Hsiang Chang, Chiao-Chin Lee, Wen-Hui Fang, Chih-Chia Wang, Yen-Yuan Chen, Wei-Shiang Lin and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05118035 (Applying an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiographic System for Reducing Mortality), which is not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05118035 nacompletednot on this map

Applying an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiographic System for Reducing Mortality: a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Defense Medical Center, TaiwanRan2021 to 2022Enrolled15,965ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Intensity Care, MoralityArmsAI-enabled ECG-based Screening Tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Chin-Sheng LinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Wei-Ting LiuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3817-4079
Dung-Jang TsaiMedical Technology Education Center, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5531-0810
Yu-Sheng LouDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chiao-Hsiang ChangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chiao-Chin LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Wen-Hui FangDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chih-Chia WangDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yen-Yuan ChenDepartment and Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Bioethics, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Wei-Shiang LinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Cheng-Chung ChengDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chia-Cheng LeeDepartment of Medical Informatics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chih-Hung WangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5058-4356
Chien-Sung TsaiDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Shih-Hua LinDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6152-4885
Chin LinMedical Technology Education Center, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. xup6fup@mail.ndmctsgh.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0003-2337-2096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early identification of vulnerable patients has the potential to improve outcomes but poses a substantial challenge in clinical practice. This study evaluated the ability of an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) to identify hospitalized patients with a high risk of mortality in a multisite randomized controlled trial involving 39 physicians and 15,965 patients. The AI-ECG alert intervention included an AI report and warning messages delivered to the physicians, flagging patients predicted to be at high risk of mortality. The trial met its primary outcome, finding that implementation of the AI-ECG alert was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality within 90 days: 3.6% patients in the intervention group died within 90 days, compared to 4.3% in the control group (4.3%) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.70-0.99). A prespecified analysis showed that reduction in all-cause mortality associated with the AI-ECG alert was observed primarily in patients with high-risk ECGs (HR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.53-0.90). In analyses of secondary outcomes, patients in the intervention group with high-risk ECGs received increased levels of intensive care compared to the control group; for the high-risk ECG group of patients, implementation of the AI-ECG alert was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of cardiac death (0.2% in the intervention arm versus 2.4% in the control arm, HR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.01-0.56). While the precise means by which implementation of the AI-ECG alert led to decreased mortality are to be fully elucidated, these results indicate that such implementation assists in the detection of high-risk patients, prompting timely clinical care and reducing mortality. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05118035 .

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceElectrocardiographyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.