Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38685039›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2024

Adapting the EQ-5D-3L for adults with mild to moderate learning disabilities.

John L O'Dwyer, Louise D Bryant, Claire Hulme, Paul Kind, David M Meads

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John L O'DwyerAcademic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK. j.odwyer@leeds.ac.uk.
Louise D BryantDivision of Psychological & Social Medicine, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Claire HulmeDepartment of Health & Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Paul KindDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
David M MeadsAcademic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
University of Leeds · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research DRF-2017-10-159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 1.5 million adults in the UK have a learning disability. The difference between age at death for this group and the general population is 26 years for females and 22 years for males. The NHS Long Term Plan (January 2019) recognises learning disabilities as a clinical priority area. People with a learning disability are often excluded from research by design or lack of reasonable adjustments, and self-reported health status/health-related quality of life questionnaires such as the EQ-5D are often not appropriate for this population. Here, we systematically examine the EQ-5D-3L (its wording, content, and format) using qualitative methods to inform the adaption of the measure for use with adults with mild to moderate learning disabilities.

methodsThink-aloud interviews with carers/advocates of learning-disabled adults were undertaken to explore the difficulties with completing the EQ-5D-3L. Alternative wording, language, structure, and images were developed using focus groups, stakeholder reference groups, and an expert panel. Data analysis followed a framework method.

resultsThe dimensions and levels within the EQ-5D-3L were deemed appropriate for adults with mild to moderate learning disabilities. Consensus on wording, structure, and images was reached through an iterative process, and an adapted version of the EQ-5D-3L was finalised.

conclusionThe EQ-5D-3L adapted for adults with mild to moderate intellectual/learning disabilities can facilitate measurement of self-reported health status. Research is underway to assess the potential use of the adaptation for economic evaluation.

Indexed as

Learning DisabilitiesQuality of LifeAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHealth StatusHumansMalePsychometricsQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung AdultEQ-5DHealth-related quality of lifeIntellectual disabilityLearning disabilityPatient-reported outcome measures.

Identifiers

PMID38685039
PMCPMC11059748
OpenAlexW4396217404

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.