ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2024
Decoding dynamic interactions between EGFR-TKD and DAC through computational and experimental approaches: A novel breakthrough in lung melanoma treatment.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biological assessment of Coccinia grandis leaf and Lupeol against β-lactam resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae through integrated in-silico and in-vitro studies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Design, synthesis, molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies of some 3-methoxy flavone derivatives as an anti-breast cancer agent.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Deciphering the Withania somnifera alkaloids potential for cure of neurodegenerative disease: an in-silico study.AMB Express · 2025Article
- Exploring KRas Protein Dynamics: An Integrated Molecular Dynamics Analysis of KRas Wild and Mutant Variants.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Decoding dynamic interactions between EGFR-TKD and DAC through computational and experimental approaches: A novel breakthrough in lung melanoma treatment.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In the quest for effective lung cancer treatments, the potential of 3,6-diaminoacridine-9-carbonitrile (DAC) has emerged as a game changer. While DAC's efficacy against glioblastoma is well documented, its role in combating lung cancer has remained largely untapped. This study focuses on CTX-1, exploring its interaction with the pivotal EGFR-TKD protein, a crucial target in lung cancer therapeutics. A meticulous molecular docking analysis revealed that CTX-1 exhibits a noteworthy binding affinity of -7.9 kcal/mol, challenging Erlotinib, a conventional lung cancer medication, which displayed a binding affinity of -7.3 kcal/mol. For a deeper understanding of CTX-1's molecular mechanics, this study employed rigorous 100-ns molecular dynamics simulations, demonstrating CTX-1's remarkable stability in comparison with erlotinib. The Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MM-PBSA) method further corroborated these results, with CTX-1 showing a free binding energy of -105.976 ± 1.916 kJ/mol. The true prowess of CTX-1 was tested against diverse lung cancer cell lines, including A549, Hop-62 and H-1299. CTX-1 not only significantly outperformed erlotinib in anticancer activity but also exhibited a spectrum of therapeutic effects. It effectively diminished cancer cell viability, induced DNA damage, halted cell cycle progression, generated reactive oxygen species (ROS), impaired mitochondrial transmembrane potential, instigated apoptosis and successfully inhibited EGFR-TKD. This study not only underscores the potential of CTX-1 a formidable contender in lung cancer treatment but also marks a paradigm shift in oncological therapeutics, offering new horizons in the fight against this formidable disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.