Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38685773›Full record

ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2025

Polymeric Molecular Envelope Technology for Improved Therapeutics Efficacy: A Review.

Jigar Vyas, Nensi Raytthatha, Bhupendra G Prajapati, Sudarshan Singh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jigar VyasDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sigma University, Vadodara, Gujarat, 390019, India.
Nensi RaytthathaDepartment of Pharmacy, Gujarat Technological University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 382424, India.
Bhupendra G PrajapatiShree S. K. Patel College of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Ganpat University, Gujarat, 384012, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8242-4541
Sudarshan SinghDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.

Funding

Centre for Advanced Research Studies (CARS) Ganpat University, Gujarat, Kherva, India 273/GUNI-ACA/FOP/MRP/373/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review explores the enhancement of therapeutic efficacy through the innovative use of polymeric molecular envelope technology (MET). It delves into the diverse methods employed to achieve superior therapeutic outcomes, shedding light on strategies for improving drug delivery and bioavailability. MET is a promising approach to improve the solubility and bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs. This technology involves the use of a molecular envelope of cyclic oligosaccharides called cyclodextrins, which is a supramolecular assembly of amphiphilic molecules that encapsulate and solubilize hydrophobic drug molecules. This can further improve the solubility of the drug by increasing its surface area and reducing its crystallinity. Moreover, MET also protects the drug from degradation and enhances its permeability across biological membranes. Furthermore, the review thoroughly examines the MET, including its methods of preparation, applications in drug encapsulation, and the evaluation of its potential to optimize therapeutic outcomes. By adopting current research and key findings, this review provides valuable insights into the transformative potential of polymeric molecular envelope technology for advancing the field of therapeutics.

Indexed as

CyclodextrinsDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsPolymersAnimalsBiological AvailabilityHumansSolubilityCyclodextrinsDrug CarriersPolymersbioavailabilityenvelope technology.hydrophobic drugMolecular envelope technologynanoparticlestherapeutic efficacy

Identifiers

PMID38685773

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.