Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38689199›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2024

A comparative retrospective analysis on robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared to conventional laparoscopy in case of myomectomy: experience in a third-level hospital of Southern Italy.

Luigi Della Corte, Giuseppe D'Angelo, Mario Ascione, Marcello Granata, Pierluigi Giampaolino, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo, Giuseppe Bifulco

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luigi Della CorteDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0584-2181
Giuseppe D'AngeloDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. giuseppedangelo1010@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2962-6565
Mario AscioneDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7845-1149
Marcello GranataDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Pierluigi GiampaolinoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Attilio Di Spiezio SardoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6485-5735
Giuseppe BifulcoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7772-8591

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine myomas are the most common gynecological disease in reproductive-aged women, present several symptoms, and require effective medical and/or surgical strategies. This study aimed to compare robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) with laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) in terms of operative times, intraoperative estimated blood loss, pre- and post-hemoglobin levels drop, and length of hospital stay. Data from 50 clinical records (25 RALM in Group A and 25 LM in Group B) of patients with uterine fibroids were collected from December 2022 to December 2023 at Gynecological Unit of DAI Materno-Infantile Federico II in Naples, Italy. Patients aged 30-49 years with symptomatic fibroids were included. Data on peri-operative outcomes, including operative time for myomectomy (OTM), overall operative time (OOT), intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), pre- and post-operative hemoglobin levels, and length of hospital stay were analyzed. The OTM in the presence of > 5 myomas was 59 [52-65] vs 69 min [61-96] (p < 0.001) for RALM and LM groups, respectively. Moreover, also in presence of ≤ 5 myomas, a difference was observed in the RALM group 48[43-55] compared to the LM group 53[50-61] min (p = 0.07). The OOT was also statistically significant for Group A compared to Group B (83[65-93] vs 72[56-110] min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of pre- and post-operative hemoglobin levels and EBL (p = 0.178). Group A demonstrated a notably shorter hospital stay 1.2 [1-2] days compared to Group B 2.9[3-3.75] days (p = 0.007). Our study suggests potential advantages of RALM over LM in terms of reduced operative times and shorter hospital stays. The standardized approach and extensive surgical experience likely contributed to the favorable outcomes of RALM.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalLaparoscopyLeiomyomaLength of StayOperative TimeRobotic Surgical ProceduresUterine MyomectomyUterine NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHemoglobinsHumansItalyMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHemoglobinsLaparoscopyMyomectomyRobotic-assisted laparoscopic surgeryUterine fibroids

Identifiers

PMID38689199
PMCPMC11541250

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.