Evidence mapPaperPMID 38689869Full record

ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2024

Revised contraindications for the use of non-medical WB-electromyostimulation. Evidence-based German consensus recommendations.

S von Stengel, M Fröhlich, O Ludwig, C Eifler, J Berger, H Kleinöder, F Micke, B Wegener, C Zinner, F C Mooren and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

S von StengelInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
M FröhlichDepartment of Sports Science, Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
O LudwigDepartment of Sports Science, Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
C EiflerGerman University for Prevention and Health Management, Saarbrücken, Germany.
J BergerGerman University for Prevention and Health Management, Saarbrücken, Germany.
H KleinöderInstitute of Training Science and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
F MickeInstitute of Training Science and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
B WegenerMusculoskeletal University Center, Ludwig-Maximilian-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
C ZinnerHessian College of Police and Administration, Wiesbaden, Germany.
F C MoorenDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
M TeschlerDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
A FilipovicSoccer Club Paderborn 07, Paderborn, Germany.
S MüllerGlucker Kolleg, Frankfurt, Germany.
K EnglandGlucker Kolleg, Frankfurt, Germany.
J VatterSoccer Club Paderborn 07, Paderborn, Germany.
S AuthenriethGlucker Kolleg, Frankfurt, Germany.
M KohlDepartment of Medical and Life Sciences, University of Furtwangen, Schwenningen, Germany.
W KemmlerInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
German Sport University Cologne · DEPaderborn University · DERheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern-LandauUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DEBundeswehr Medical Service Academy · DEFurtwangen University · DEHessische Hochschule für Polizei und Verwaltung · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-body electromyostimulation has proven to be a highly effective alternative to conventional resistance-type exercise training. However, due to adverse effects in the past, very extensive contraindications have been put in place for the commercial, non-medical WB-EMS market. Considering recent positive innovations e.g., federal regulation, mandatory trainer education, revised guidelines, and new scientific studies on WB-EMS application, we believe that a careful revision of the very restrictive contraindications on WB-EMS is needed. This applies all the more because many cohorts with limited options for conventional exercise have so far been excluded. During a first meeting of an evidence-based consensus process, stakeholders from various backgrounds (e.g., research, education, application) set the priorities for revising the contraindications. We decided to focus on four categories of absolute contraindications: "Arteriosclerosis, arterial circulation disorders", "Diabetes mellitus" (DM), "Tumor and cancer" (TC), "Neurologic diseases, neuronal disorders, epilepsy". Based on scientific studies, quality criteria, safety aspects and benefit/risk assessment of the category, DM and TC were moved to the relative contraindication catalogue, while arteriosclerosis/arterial circulation disorders and neurologic diseases/neuronal disorders/epilepsy were still considered as absolute contraindications. While missing evidence suggests maintaining the status of neurologic diseases/neuronal disorders as an absolute contraindication, the risk/benefit-ratio does not support the application of WB-EMS in people with arteriosclerosis/arterial circulation diseases. Despite these very cautious modifications, countries with less restrictive structures for non-medical WB-EMS should consider our approach critically before implementing the present revisions. Considering further the largely increased amount of WB-EMS trials we advice regular updates of the present contraindication list.

Indexed as

arteriosclerosiscancercontraindicationsdiabetes mellitusneurologic diseaseswhole-body electromyostimulation

Identifiers

PMID38689869
PMCPMC11058671
OpenAlexW4394850316

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.