ArticleCureus2024
The Predictors of Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Applying Sepsis Six Guidelines Among Critical Care Nurses.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design and Development of a Machine Learning Model for Predicting ICU Patients' Length of Stay.Cureus · 2025Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing the Sepsis Six Care Bundle (BLISS-1) Questionnaire.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Barriers and Facilitators Affecting the Implementation of the Sepsis Six Protocol by Nurses in Acute Care Settings in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is a life-threatening condition that demands quick and cautious interventions from nurses, as they are the frontline caregivers, so they are essential in recognizing early signs of sepsis, initiating prompt healthcare interventions, and providing comprehensive care to improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to examine the predictors of perceived barriers and facilitators of applying evidence-based sepsis guidelines among critical care nurses.
methodsThis cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on a convenience sample of 180 nurses working in critical care settings (ICU, critical care unit, ED, burning unit, dialysis unit) at a university hospital. A valid and reliable questionnaire was used to examine the predictors of perceived barriers and facilitators of applying evidence-based sepsis guidelines among critical care nurses.
resultsThis study revealed that the main barriers faced by critical care nurses are lack of sepsis recognition during observational rounds and delay in sepsis diagnosis by medical staff. For the most common facilitators of applying Sepsis Six guidelines, the participating nurses reported the presence of a written tool/protocol for sepsis identification and management.
conclusionsThe study emphasized the importance of the presence of evidence-based protocols for sepsis assessment and management and nurses' compliance with guidelines. Ongoing education training for nurses and providing step-by-step written checklists are a cornerstone to improving nurses' knowledge and the practical skills of early identification and management of sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.