Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38695832›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024

Minimal Residual Disease using a Plasma-Only Circulating Tumor DNA Assay to Predict Recurrence of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Following Curative Intent Treatment.

Aparna R Parikh, Bryant H Chee, Jill Tsai, Thereasa A Rich, Kristin S Price, Sonia A Patel, Li Zhang, Faaiz Ibrahim, Mikaela Esquivel, Emily E Van Seventer and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. ctDNA in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Critical Appraisal.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aparna R ParikhDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-5245-7841
Bryant H CheeUniversity of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (HDFCCC), San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1197-5351
Jill TsaiGuardant Health, Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7244-4477
Thereasa A RichGuardant Health, Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0003-3023-6930
Kristin S PriceGuardant Health, Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4300-6413
Sonia A PatelGuardant Health, Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6494-7872
Li ZhangUniversity of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (HDFCCC), San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-3617-2627
Faaiz IbrahimUniversity of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (HDFCCC), San Francisco, California.ORCID 0009-0007-9949-4520
Mikaela EsquivelUniversity of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (HDFCCC), San Francisco, California.ORCID 0009-0004-0628-227X
Emily E Van SeventerDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0009-0009-9179-3221
Joy X JarnaginDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-9840-4713
Victoria M RaymondDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-5223-0981
Carlos U CorveraUniversity of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (HDFCCC), San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-3092-8657
Kenzo HiroseUniversity of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (HDFCCC), San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0001-8167-2690
Eric K NakakuraUniversity of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (HDFCCC), San Francisco, California.ORCID 0009-0007-3714-7072
Ryan B CorcoranDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-8173-5778
Katherine Van LoonUniversity of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (HDFCCC), San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-9705-4114
Chloe E AtreyaUniversity of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (HDFCCC), San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0003-2954-1727
University of California, San Francisco · USHarvard University · USGuardant (United States) · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Systematic liquid biopsy to monitor residual disease and treatment efficacy in gastrointestinal cancer patientsK08CA273688 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Aparna Raj Parikh · 2022 to 2026
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA273688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMinimal residual disease (MRD) detection can identify the recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) following definitive treatment. We evaluated a plasma-only MRD assay to predict recurrence and survival in patients with metastatic CRC who underwent curative intent procedures (surgery and/or radiotherapy), with or without (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary objective of this study was to assess the correlation of postprocedure tumor cell-free DNA detection status with radiographic disease recurrence. EXPERIMENTAL

designPreprocedure and postprocedure longitudinal samples were collected from 53 patients and analyzed with a multiomic MRD assay detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from genomic and epigenomic signals. Preprocedure and postprocedure ctDNA detection correlated with recurrence-free and overall survival (OS).

resultsFrom 52 patients, 230/233 samples were successfully analyzed. At the time of data cutoff, 36 (69.2%) patients recurred with median follow-up of 31 months. Detectable ctDNA was observed in 19/42 patients (45.2%) with ctDNA analyzed 3 weeks postprocedure. ctDNA detection 3 weeks postprocedure was associated with shorter median recurrence-free survival (RFS; HR, 5.27; 95% CI, 2.31-12.0; P < 0.0001) and OS (HR, 12.83; 95% CI, 3.6-45.9; P < 0.0001). Preprocedure ctDNA detection status was not associated with RFS but was associated with improved OS (HR, 4.65; 95% CI, 1.4-15.2; P = 0.0111). Undetectable ctDNA preprocedure had notable long-term OS, >90% 3 years postprocedure.

conclusionsIn this cohort of oligometastatic CRC, detection of ctDNA preprocedure or postprocedure was associated with inferior outcomes even after accounting for known prognostic clinicopathologic variables. This suggests ctDNA may enhance current risk stratification methods helping the evaluation of novel treatments and surveillance strategies toward improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID38695832
PMCPMC11247320
OpenAlexW4396578335

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.