Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38698273›Full record

ReviewArchives of dermatological research2024

3D bioprinting: a review and potential applications for Mohs micrographic surgery.

Anika Pulumati, Yanci A Algarin, Sarah Kim, Steven Latta, Jeffrey N Li, Keyvan Nouri

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anika PulumatiUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA. alpc97@umsystem.edu.
Yanci A AlgarinEastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Sarah KimUniversity of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Steven LattaFlorida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Jeffrey N LiDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, 455 NE 24th St. Apt 615, Miami, FL, 33137, USA.
Keyvan NouriDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, 455 NE 24th St. Apt 615, Miami, FL, 33137, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) is effective for treating common cutaneous malignancies, but complex repairs may often present challenges for reconstruction. This paper explores the potential of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting in MMS, offering superior outcomes compared to traditional methods. 3D printing technologies show promise in advancing skin regeneration and refining surgical techniques in dermatologic surgery. A PubMed search was conducted using the following keywords: "Three-dimensional bioprinting" OR "3-D printing" AND "Mohs" OR "Mohs surgery" OR "Surgery." Peer-reviewed English articles discussing medical applications of 3D bioprinting were included, while non-peer-reviewed and non-English articles were excluded. Patients using 3D MMS models had lower anxiety scores (3.00 to 1.7, p < 0.0001) and higher knowledge assessment scores (5.59 or 93.25% correct responses), indicating better understanding of their procedure. Surgical residents using 3D models demonstrated improved proficiency in flap reconstructions (p = 0.002) and knowledge assessment (p = 0.001). Additionally, 3D printing offers personalized patient care through tailored surgical guides and anatomical models, reducing intraoperative time while enhancing surgical. Concurrently, efforts in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine are being explored as potential alternatives to address organ donor shortages, eliminating autografting needs. However, challenges like limited training and technological constraints persist. Integrating optical coherence tomography with 3D bioprinting may expedite grafting, but challenges remain in pre-printing grafts for complex cases. Regulatory and ethical considerations are paramount for patient safety, and further research is needed to understand long-term effects and cost-effectiveness. While promising, significant advancements are necessary for full utilization in MMS.

Indexed as

BioprintingMohs SurgeryPrinting, Three-DimensionalSkin NeoplasmsHumansModels, AnatomicPlastic Surgery ProceduresRegenerative MedicineSkinSurgical FlapsTissue EngineeringMohs micrographic surgerySkin bioprintingSkin regenerationThree-dimensional bioprinting

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.