Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38698840›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Designing combination therapies for cancer treatment: application of a mathematical framework combining CAR T-cell immunotherapy and targeted radionuclide therapy.

Vikram Adhikarla, Dennis Awuah, Enrico Caserta, Megan Minnix, Maxim Kuznetsov, Amrita Krishnan, Jefferey Y C Wong, John E Shively, Xiuli Wang, Flavia Pichiorri and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for CAR-T cell delivery and efficacy in solid tumors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vikram AdhikarlaDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Dennis AwuahDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Enrico CasertaDepartment of Hematologic Malignancies Translational Science, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Megan MinnixDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Maxim KuznetsovDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Amrita KrishnanDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Jefferey Y C WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
John E ShivelyDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Xiuli WangDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Flavia PichiorriDepartment of Hematologic Malignancies Translational Science, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Russell C RockneDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States.

Funding

Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI XIWEI WU · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
Exploring the preclinical relevance of therapeutic radiolabeled daratumumab (anti-CD38) in combination with anti-CS1 CAR T cells as a novel combinatorial treatment for multiple myelomaR01CA238429 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI PICHIORRI, FLAVIA, ROCKNE, RUSSELL CHRISTIAN · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
Improving Outcomes for Multiple Myeloma Patients through Novel Therapeutic InterventionsR50CA252135 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI CASERTA, ENRICO · 2021 to 2025
$564k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572NCI NIH HHS R01 CA238429NCI NIH HHS R50 CA252135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer combination treatments involving immunotherapies with targeted radiation therapy are at the forefront of treating cancers. However, dosing and scheduling of these therapies pose a challenge. Mathematical models provide a unique way of optimizing these therapies. Methods: Using a preclinical model of multiple myeloma as an example, we demonstrate the capability of a mathematical model to combine these therapies to achieve maximum response, defined as delay in tumor growth. Data from mice studies with targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell monotherapies and combinations with different intervals between them was used to calibrate mathematical model parameters. The dependence of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the time to minimum tumor burden on dosing and scheduling was evaluated. Different dosing and scheduling schemes were evaluated to maximize the PFS and optimize timings of TRT and CAR-T cell therapies. Results: Therapy intervals that were too close or too far apart are shown to be detrimental to the therapeutic efficacy, as TRT too close to CAR-T cell therapy results in radiation related CAR-T cell killing while the therapies being too far apart result in tumor regrowth, negatively impacting tumor control and survival. We show that splitting a dose of TRT or CAR-T cells when administered in combination is advantageous only if the first therapy delivered can produce a significant benefit as a monotherapy. Discussion: Mathematical models are crucial tools for optimizing the delivery of cancer combination therapy regimens with application along the lines of achieving cure, maximizing survival or minimizing toxicity.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAnimalsCell Line, TumorCombined Modality TherapyHumansMiceModels, TheoreticalMultiple MyelomaNeoplasmsRadioisotopesT-LymphocytesXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysRadioisotopesReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR T cellscombination therapydaratumumabmathematical modelmyelomaradionuclidetargeted alpha therapy

Identifiers

PMID38698840
PMCPMC11063284

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.