ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Designing combination therapies for cancer treatment: application of a mathematical framework combining CAR T-cell immunotherapy and targeted radionuclide therapy.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mathematical modeling of immune counter-regulation predicts efficacy of fractionated CD8Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Minimal Model Framework for Robust CAR-T Cell and Oncolytic Virus Combination Therapy.Research square · 2026Article
- A Pharmacologic Model Predicts that Tumor Debulking Improves CAR T-cell Efficacy in Large B-cell Lymphoma.Blood cancer discovery · 2026Article
- Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for CAR-T cell delivery and efficacy in solid tumors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- CAR T-cell and oncolytic virus dynamics and determinants of combination therapy success for glioblastoma.Mathematical biosciences · 2025Article
- Mesoporous silica nanoparticle-based nanomedicine: Preparation, functional modification, and theranostic applications.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for CAR-T cells delivery and efficacy in solid tumors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Using mathematical modelling and AI to improve delivery and efficacy of therapies in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
- Advances in Gene Therapy with Oncolytic Viruses and CAR-T Cells and Therapy-Related Groups.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Mathematical Modeling Unveils Optimization Strategies for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Blood Cancers.Cancer research communications · 2024Article
- Review
- Mathematical Modeling Unveils Optimization Strategies for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Blood Cancers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Cancer combination treatments involving immunotherapies with targeted radiation therapy are at the forefront of treating cancers. However, dosing and scheduling of these therapies pose a challenge. Mathematical models provide a unique way of optimizing these therapies. Methods: Using a preclinical model of multiple myeloma as an example, we demonstrate the capability of a mathematical model to combine these therapies to achieve maximum response, defined as delay in tumor growth. Data from mice studies with targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell monotherapies and combinations with different intervals between them was used to calibrate mathematical model parameters. The dependence of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the time to minimum tumor burden on dosing and scheduling was evaluated. Different dosing and scheduling schemes were evaluated to maximize the PFS and optimize timings of TRT and CAR-T cell therapies. Results: Therapy intervals that were too close or too far apart are shown to be detrimental to the therapeutic efficacy, as TRT too close to CAR-T cell therapy results in radiation related CAR-T cell killing while the therapies being too far apart result in tumor regrowth, negatively impacting tumor control and survival. We show that splitting a dose of TRT or CAR-T cells when administered in combination is advantageous only if the first therapy delivered can produce a significant benefit as a monotherapy. Discussion: Mathematical models are crucial tools for optimizing the delivery of cancer combination therapy regimens with application along the lines of achieving cure, maximizing survival or minimizing toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.