ArticleHeliyon2024
In-shoe plantar pressure measurement technologies for the diabetic foot: A systematic review.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Electronic Systems for Monitoring Pediatric Gait Biomechanical Parameters: A Systematic Review of Embedded Technologies and Human-Machine Interfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Diabetic foot prevention, assessment, and management using innovative smart wearable technology: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Durability and offloading performance of 3D-printed multilayer lattice for accommodative insoles.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026Article
- Wearable Technologies for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Monitoring and Risk Prediction: Systematic Review.JMIR diabetes · 2026Review
- Clinical Translation of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Gait Analysis Using Plantar Pressure and Ground Reaction Force.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multimodal Feature-Level Fusion CBAM U-Net for Static Plantar Pressure Prediction Using Plantar Geometry and Sparse Anatomical Landmarks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Innovative strategies for diabetic peripheral neuropathy: From clinical management to emerging bioengineering solutions.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Usability Evaluation and Perceived Performance of the MoonWalkingSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Static to Dynamic: Complementary Roles of FSR and Piezoelectric Sensors in Wearable Gait and Pressure Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Piezoresistive plantar pressure sensors and CNN-based body weight and load estimation.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- A Portable Insole System for Actively Controlled Offloading of Plantar Pressure for Diabetic Foot Care.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development of a Body-Worn Textile-Based Strain Sensor: Application to Diabetic Foot Assessment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- In-shoe plantar temperature, normal and shear stress relationships during gait and rest periods for people living with and without diabetes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Calibration and Modeling of the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament for Diabetic Foot Management.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Loss of cutaneous protective sensation and high plantar pressures increase the risk for diabetic foot patients. Trauma and ulceration are imminent threats, making assessment and monitoring essential. This systematic review aims to identify systems and technologies for measuring in-shoe plantar pressures, focusing on the at-risk diabetic foot population. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across four electronic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Oxford Journals) using PRISMA methodology, covering articles published in English from 1979 to 2024. Only studies addressing systems or sensors exclusively measuring plantar pressures inside the shoe were included. Results: A total of 87 studies using commercially available devices and 45 articles proposing new systems or sensors were reviewed. The prevailing market offerings consist mainly of instrumented insoles. Emerging technologies under development often feature configurations with four, six or eight resistive sensors strategically placed within removable insoles. Despite some variability due to the inherent heterogeneity of human gait, these devices assess plantar pressure, although they present significant differences between them in measurement results. Individuals with diabetic foot conditions appears exhibit elevated plantar pressures, with reported peak pressures reaching approximately 1000 kPa. The results also showed significant differences between the diabetic and non-diabetic groups. Conclusion: Instrumented insoles, particularly those incorporating resistive sensor technology, dominate the field. Systems employing eight sensors at critical locations represent a pragmatic approach, although market options extend to systems with up to 960 sensors. Differences between devices can be a critical factor in measurement and highlights the importance of individualized patient assessment using consistent measurement devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.