Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38699289›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2024

Use of the Chinese version of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery to assess cognitive functioning in individuals with high risk for psychosis, first-episode schizophrenia and chronic schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bing Cai, Yikang Zhu, Dongyang Liu, Yaxi Li, Marlys Bueber, Xuezhi Yang, Guoshuai Luo, Ying Su, Margaux M Grivel, Lawrence H Yang and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bing CaiShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yikang ZhuShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Dongyang LiuSchool of Public Health of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yaxi LiShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Marlys BueberShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xuezhi YangThe Fifth People's Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Guoshuai LuoMental Health Center of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Ying SuShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Margaux M GrivelDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Lawrence H YangDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Min QianBiostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
William S StoneDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael R PhillipsShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

Characterizing Cognition across the Lifespan in untreated psychosis in ChinaR01MH108385 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI KESHAVAN, MATCHERI S., PHILLIPS, MICHAEL ROBERT · 2015 to 2019
$4.0M
Longitudinal trajectories in treated and untreated schizophreniaR01MH127631 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI KESHAVAN, MATCHERI S., STONE, WILLIAM SETH · 2021 to 2023
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108385NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH127631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than one hundred studies have used the mainland Chinese version of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) to assess cognition in schizophrenia, but the results of these studies, the quality of the reports, and the strength of the evidence provided in the reports have not been systematically assessed. We identified 114 studies from English-language and Chinese-language databases that used the Chinese MCCB to assess cognition in combined samples of 7394 healthy controls (HC), 392 individuals with clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P), 4922 with first-episode schizophrenia (FES), 1549 with chronic schizophrenia (CS), and 2925 with schizophrenia of unspecified duration. The mean difference (MD) of the composite MCCB T-score (-13.72) and T-scores of each of the seven cognitive domains assessed by MCCB (-14.27 to -7.92) were significantly lower in individuals with schizophrenia than in controls. Meta-analysis identified significantly greater cognitive impairment in FES and CS than in CHR-P in six of the seven domains and significantly greater impairment in CS than FES in the reasoning and problem-solving domain (i.e., executive functioning). The only significant covariate of overall cognitive functioning in individuals with schizophrenia was a negative association with the severity of psychotic symptoms. These results confirm the construct validity of the mainland Chinese version of MCCB. However, there were significant limitations in the strength of the evidence provided about CHR-P (small pooled sample sizes) and the social cognition domain (inconsistency of results across studies), and the quality of many reports (particularly those published in Chinese) was rated 'poor' due to failure to report sample size calculations, matching procedures or methods of handling missing data. Moreover, almost all studies were cross-sectional studies limited to persons under 60 with at least nine years of education, so longitudinal studies of under-educated, older individuals with schizophrenia are needed.

Indexed as

Chronic schizophreniaClinical high riskCognitionFirst-episode schizophreniaMCCBSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID38699289
PMCPMC11064724

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.