Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38699307›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Long-Term Follow-Up Defines the Population That Benefits from Early Interception in a High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trial Using the Combination of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone.

Omar Nadeem, Michelle P Aranha, Robert Redd, Michael Timonian, Sophie Magidson, Elizabeth D Lightbody, Jean-Baptiste Alberge, Luca Bertamini, Ankit K Dutta, Habib El-Khoury and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02916771 (Phase II Trial of Combination of Ixazomib and Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02916771 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Trial of Combination of Ixazomib and Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2016 to 2025Enrolled61ConditionsSmoldering Multiple MyelomaArmsIxazomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Multiple myeloma risk linked to DNA damage response genes.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Omar NadeemCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Michelle P AranhaCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Robert ReddDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael TimonianCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Sophie MagidsonCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth D LightbodyCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Jean-Baptiste AlbergeCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Luca BertaminiCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Ankit K DuttaCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Habib El-KhouryCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Mark BustorosCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Jacob P LaubachCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Giada BianchiCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth O'DonnellCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Ting WuBroad Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Junko TsujiBroad Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Kenneth AndersonCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Gad GetzBroad Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Lorenzo TrippaDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Paul G RichardsonCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Romanos Sklavenitis-PistofidisCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Irene M GhobrialCenter for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Molecular Prediction of Myeloma Initiation Molecular Prediction of Myeloma InitiationR35CA263817 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Irene M. Ghobrial · 2022 to 2026
$5.1M
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA263817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early therapeutic intervention in high-risk SMM (HR-SMM) has demonstrated benefit in previous studies of lenalidomide with or without dexamethasone. Triplets and quadruplet studies have been examined in this same population. However, to date, none of these studies examined the impact of depth of response on long-term outcomes of participants treated with lenalidomide-based therapy, and whether the use of the 20/2/20 model or the addition of genomic alterations can further define the population that would benefit the most from early therapeutic intervention. Here, we present the results of the phase II study of the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with HR-SMM with long-term follow-up and baseline single-cell tumor and immune sequencing that help refine the population to be treated for early intervention studies. Methods: This is a phase II trial of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IRD) in HR-SMM. Patients received 9 cycles of induction therapy with ixazomib 4mg on days 1, 8, and 15; lenalidomide 25mg on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 40mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. The induction phase was followed by maintenance with ixazomib 4mg on days 1, 8, and 15; and lenalidomide 15mg d1-21 for 15 cycles for 24 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival after 2 years of therapy. Secondary endpoints included depth of response, biochemical progression, and correlative studies included single-cell RNA sequencing and/or whole-genome sequencing of the tumor and single-cell sequencing of immune cells at baseline. Results: Fifty-five patients, with a median age of 64, were enrolled in the study. The overall response rate was 93%, with 31% of patients achieving a complete response and 45% achieving a very good partial response or better. The most common grade 3 or greater treatment-related hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (16 patients; 29%), leukopenia (10 patients; 18%), lymphocytopenia (8 patients; 15%), and thrombocytopenia (4 patients; 7%). Non-hematologic grade 3 or greater toxicities included hypophosphatemia (7 patients; 13%), rash (5 patients; 9%), and hypokalemia (4 patients; 7%). After a median follow-up of 50 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 48.6 months (95% CI: 39.9 - not reached; NR) and median overall survival has not been reached. Patients achieving VGPR or better had a significantly better progression-free survival (p<0.001) compared to those who did not achieve VGPR (median PFS 58.2 months vs. 31.3 months). Biochemical progression preceded or was concurrent with the development of SLiM-CRAB criteria in eight patients during follow-up, indicating that biochemical progression is a meaningful endpoint that correlates with the development of end-organ damage. High-risk 20/2/20 participants had the worst PFS compared to low- and intermediate-risk participants. The use of whole genome or single-cell sequencing of tumor cells identified high-risk aberrations that were not identified by FISH alone and aided in the identification of participants at risk of progression. scRNA-seq analysis revealed a positive correlation between MHC class I expression and response to proteasome inhibition and at the same time a decreased proportion of GZMB+ T cells within the clonally expanded CD8+ T cell population correlated with suboptimal response. Conclusions: Ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in HR-SMM demonstrates significant clinical activity with an overall favorable safety profile. Achievement of VGPR or greater led to significant improvement in time to progression, suggesting that achieving deep response is beneficial in HR-SMM. Biochemical progression correlates with end-organ damage. Patients with high-risk FISH and lack of deep response had poor outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: (NCT02916771).

Identifiers

PMID38699307
PMCPMC11064995

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.