Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38699471›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2024

Double-blind, randomized, 8-week multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of STW 5-II

Bettina Vinson, Careen Fink, Manfred Wargenau, Nicholas J Talley, Gerald Holtmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bettina VinsonBayer Consumer Health, Steigerwald Arzneimittelwerk GmbH Darmstadt Germany.
Careen FinkBayer Consumer Health, Steigerwald Arzneimittelwerk GmbH Darmstadt Germany.
Manfred WargenauM.A.R.C.O. GmbH & Co. KG, Institute for Clinical Research and Statistics Düsseldorf Germany.
Nicholas J TalleySchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia.
Gerald HoltmannUniversity of Queensland and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Princess Alexandra Hospital Woolloongabba Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0206-2358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Herbal products are widely used to treat patients with disorders of gut brain interaction but clinical efficacy and safety data for treatments lasting >4 weeks are widely lacking. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of treatment with the herbal combination product STW 5-II for patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) meeting Rome II criteria. We also conducted a post hoc analysis including patients meeting Rome IV criteria for FD and evaluated the effect of the G-protein beta 3 (GNB3) subunit polymorphism (C825T) on therapeutic response. Methods: This multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind study included 272 FD patients meeting Rome II criteria in the intention-to-treat cohort and 266 meeting Rome IV criteria. We used the validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Score (GIS) to assess GI symptoms, defining response rate as the proportion of patients with ≥50% GIS improvement in at least three of four assessments. Results: After 8 weeks, the response rate was significantly higher in the STW 5-II group Conclusion: STW 5-II is efficacious, with no observed safety signals at up to 8 weeks of treatment in patients with FD meeting Rome II or IV criteria.

Indexed as

efficacyfunctional dyspepsiaRome criteriasafetySTW 5‐II

Identifiers

PMID38699471
PMCPMC11064020

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.