Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38699648›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2024

Development of a chest X-ray machine learning convolutional neural network model on a budget and using artificial intelligence explainability techniques to analyze patterns of machine learning inference.

Stephen B Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An Introduction to AI for Clinicians: Tutorial.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephen B LeeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, S4P 0W5, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6253-293X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Machine learning (ML) will have a large impact on medicine and accessibility is important. This study's model was used to explore various concepts including how varying features of a model impacted behavior. Materials and Methods: This study built an ML model that classified chest X-rays as normal or abnormal by using ResNet50 as a base with transfer learning. A contrast enhancement mechanism was implemented to improve performance. After training with a dataset of publicly available chest radiographs, performance metrics were determined with a test set. The ResNet50 base was substituted with deeper architectures (ResNet101/152) and visualization methods used to help determine patterns of inference. Results: Performance metrics were an accuracy of 79%, recall 69%, precision 96%, and area under the curve of 0.9023. Accuracy improved to 82% and recall to 74% with contrast enhancement. When visualization methods were applied and the ratio of pixels used for inference measured, deeper architectures resulted in the model using larger portions of the image for inference as compared to ResNet50. Discussion: The model performed on par with many existing models despite consumer-grade hardware and smaller datasets. Individual models vary thus a single model's explainability may not be generalizable. Therefore, this study varied architecture and studied patterns of inference. With deeper ResNet architectures, the machine used larger portions of the image to make decisions. Conclusion: An example using a custom model showed that AI (Artificial Intelligence) can be accessible on consumer-grade hardware, and it also demonstrated an example of studying themes of ML explainability by varying ResNet architectures.

Indexed as

budgetchest X-rayclassificationdevelopmentmodelSHAP

Identifiers

PMID38699648
PMCPMC11064095

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.