Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38700799›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Assessing Endoscopic Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: Development and Validation of a Highly Accurate Convolutional Neural Network.

Hannah Williams, Hannah M Thompson, Christina Lee, Aneesh Rangnekar, Jorge T Gomez, Maria Widmar, Iris H Wei, Emmanouil P Pappou, Garrett M Nash, Martin R Weiser and 4 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nonoperative management of rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hannah WilliamsDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Hannah M ThompsonDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Christina LeeDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Aneesh RangnekarDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Jorge T GomezDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Maria WidmarDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Iris H WeiDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Emmanouil P PappouDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Garrett M NashDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Martin R WeiserDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Philip B PatyDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
J Joshua SmithDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Harini VeeraraghavanDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Julio Garcia-AguilarDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. garciaaj@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Organ Preservation in Rectal AdenocarcinomaR01CA182551 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI GARCIA-AGUILAR, JULIO · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA182551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRectal tumors display varying degrees of response to total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). We evaluated the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) in interpreting endoscopic images of either a non-complete response to TNT or local regrowth during watch-and-wait surveillance.

methodsEndoscopic images from stage II/III rectal cancers treated with TNT from 2012 to 2020 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Images were labelled as Tumor or No Tumor based on endoscopy timing (before, during, or after treatment) and the tumor's endoluminal response. A CNN was trained using ResNet-50 architecture. The area under the curve (AUC) was analyzed during training and for two test sets. The main test set included images of tumors treated with TNT. The other contained images of local regrowth. The model's performance was compared to sixteen surgeons and surgical trainees who evaluated 119 images for evidence of tumor. Fleiss' kappa was calculated by respondent experience level.

resultsA total of 2717 images from 288 patients were included; 1407 (51.8%) contained tumor. The AUC was 0.99, 0.98, and 0.92 for training, main test, and local regrowth test sets. The model performed on par with surgeons of all experience levels for the main test set. Interobserver agreement was good (

conclusionsA highly accurate CNN matched the performance of colorectal surgeons in identifying a noncomplete response to TNT. However, the model demonstrated suboptimal accuracy when analyzing images of local regrowth.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyNeural Networks, ComputerRectal NeoplasmsAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceEndoscopyLocally advanced rectal cancerNonoperative managementTotal neoadjuvant therapy

Identifiers

PMID38700799
PMCPMC11600550

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.