Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38700812›Full record

ArticlePituitary2024

The diagnosis and prevalence of hypoprolactinemia in patients with panhypopituitarism and the effects on depression and sexual functions.

Ilknur Uzun, Zuleyha Karaca, Aysa Hacioğlu, Kursad Unluhizarci, Fahrettin Kelestimur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Diagnosis of hypoprolactinemia.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Traumatic brain injury and prolactin.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024
    Review
  9. Drug induced hypoprolactinemia.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024
    Review
  10. The molecular basis of hypoprolactinaemia.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ilknur UzunFaculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4927-6847
Zuleyha KaracaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey. zuleyha@erciyes.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3241-2352
Aysa HacioğluFaculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6197-5659
Kursad UnluhizarciFaculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2024-7433
Fahrettin KelestimurFaculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology, Yeditepe University, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2861-4683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to investigate the prevalence and the diagnostic criteria of hypoprolactinemia in patients with panhypopituitarism and the effects of hypoprolactinemia on depression and sexual functions. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-eight patients with panhypopituitarism and 20 healthy volunteers were included. Basal hormone levels were measured and a TRH stimulation test was performed. For the evaluation of sexual functions, questionnaries of Female Sexual Functional Index (FSFI) for females and International Erectile Functional Index for males were performed to the subjects. Depressive symptoms were evaluated by Beck Depression Envontory score (BDI-II).

resultsThe peak PRL response to TRH stimulation test at 5th percentile in the control group was 18.6 ng/ml in males and 41.6 ng/ml in females and accepted as the cut-offs for sufficient response of PRL. Prolactin was insufficient in 42(87.5%) patients. A basal PRL level of ≤ 5.7 ng/ml in males and 7.11 ng/ml in females was 100% specific in predicting an inadequate response to TRH stimulation test with 80% and 70% sensitivity respectively. A basal PRL level of ≥ 8.5 ng/dl in males was 100% specific and 76% sensitive, and in females a level of ≥ 15.2 ng/dl was 96% specific and 66% sensitive in predicting an adequate response to TRH. PRL deficient patients with panhypopituitarism had higher depression scores compared to the controls, lower sexual function scores in males.

conclusionPRL deficiency is prevalent among individuals with panhypopituitarism, with the potential to result in elevated depression scores in both sexes and impaired sexual functions in males. A basal PRL level seems to be sufficient for the diagnosis of hypoprolactinemia in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

DepressionHypopituitarismProlactinAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceThyrotropin-Releasing HormoneYoung AdultProlactinThyrotropin-Releasing HormoneDepressionHypopituitarismHypoprolactinemiaProlactinSexual functionsTRH stimulation test

Identifiers

PMID38700812
PMCPMC11150180

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.