Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38701185›Full record

SynthesisInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II A/B Seminomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bárbara Vieira Lima Aguiar Melão, Lucas Guimarães Campos Roriz de Amorim, Murilo Ribeiro Sanches, Giovanna Veiga Gomes, Douglas Mesadri Gewehr, Luis Henrique de Oliveira Moreira, Thaise Pedreira da Silva, Matheus de Melo Lobo, Gustavo Ruschi Bechara

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Robotic-Assisted Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in a Challenging Post-Chemotherapy Case.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  2. Article
  3. International Brazilian Journal of Urology highlights experimental studies in Infertility in this number.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bárbara Vieira Lima Aguiar MelãoDivisão de Urologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Lucas Guimarães Campos Roriz de AmorimDivisão de Urologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Murilo Ribeiro SanchesDepartamento de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brasil.
Giovanna Veiga GomesDepartamento de Medicina, Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul, São Caetano do Sul, SP, Brasil.
Douglas Mesadri GewehrInstituto do Coração de Curitiba, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Luis Henrique de Oliveira MoreiraDepartamento de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Thaise Pedreira da SilvaDepartamento de Cirurgia, Hospital Santa Izabel, Salvador, Brasil.
Matheus de Melo LoboDivisão de Cirurgia Oncológica, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Gustavo Ruschi BecharaDivisão de Urologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChemotherapy and radiation therapy are considered standard treatments for stage II seminoma patients; however, these therapies are associated with long-term toxicities. Recently, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has emerged as an alternative strategy, and the first three phase II trials were published in 2023 with promising results. The present study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate this surgery as an alternative treatment for stage IIA/B seminoma patients. PURPOSE: Seminomas are the most common testicular tumors, often affecting young adult males. Standard treatments for stage II seminomas include chemotherapy and radiation therapy, but these therapies are associated with long-term toxicities. Thus, identifying alternative strategies is paramount. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to appraise the efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for treating this condition.

methodsWe systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating RPLND as a primary treatment for stage II A/B seminomas. Using a random-effects model, single proportion and means and pooled 2-year recurrence-free survival rates with hazard rates and 95% CI were calculated.

resultsSeven studies were included, comprising 331 males with stage II seminomas. In the pooled analysis, the recurrence rate was 17.69% (95% CI 12.31-24.75), and the 2-year RFS rate was 81% (95% CI 0.77-0.86). The complication rate was 9.16% (95% CI 6.16-13.42), the Clavien-Dindo > 2 complication rate was 8.83% (95% CI 5.76-13.31), and the retrograde ejaculation rate was 7.01% (95% CI 3.54-13.40). The median operative time was 174.68 min (95% CI 122.17-249.76 min), median blood loss was 105.91 mL (95% CI 46.89-239.22 mL), and patients with no evidence of lymph node involvement ranged from 0-16%.

conclusionsPrimary RPLNDs for treating stage IIA/B seminomas have favorable RFS rates, with low complication and recurrence rates. These findings provide evidence that this surgery is a viable alternative therapy for these patients.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionNeoplasm StagingSeminomaTesticular NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalHumansMaleRetroperitoneal SpaceTreatment OutcomeMale Germ Cell Tumor [Supplementary Concept]SeminomaTesticular Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID38701185
PMCPMC11262717

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.