Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38702834›Full record

ReviewJournal of cannabis research2024

An emerging trend in Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPSs): designer THC.

Cristian Caprari, Elena Ferri, Maria Angela Vandelli, Cinzia Citti, Giuseppe Cannazza

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cannabis research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Chemometric Optimization of BFChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Correction: Competing Interests.Journal of cannabis research · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cristian CaprariClinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, 41125, Italy.
Elena FerriDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Campi 103, Modena, 41125, Italy.
Maria Angela VandelliDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Campi 103, Modena, 41125, Italy.
Cinzia CittiDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Campi 103, Modena, 41125, Italy. cinzia.citti@unimore.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9210-5074
Giuseppe CannazzaDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Campi 103, Modena, 41125, Italy. giuseppe.cannazza@unimore.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its discovery as one of the main components of cannabis and its affinity towards the cannabinoid receptor CB1, serving as a means to exert its psychoactivity, Δ

Indexed as

Designer drugsHHCNPSSynthetic cannabinoidsTHC

Identifiers

PMID38702834
PMCPMC11067227

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.