Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38705179›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Towards a toolkit for global insect biodiversity monitoring.

Roel van Klink, Julie Koch Sheard, Toke T Høye, Tomas Roslin, Leandro A Do Nascimento, Silke Bauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prospects for Complete DNA Barcode Coverage of the New Zealand Insect Fauna.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sharing insect data through GBIF: novel monitoring methods, opportunities and standards.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Time and habitat structure shape insect acoustic activity in the Amazon.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Monitoring aerial insect biodiversity: a radar perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roel van KlinkGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, Leipzig 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8125-1463
Julie Koch SheardGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, Leipzig 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1073-0221
Toke T HøyeDepartment of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, C. F. Møllers Allé 8, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5387-3284
Tomas RoslinDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Ulls väg 18B, Uppsala 75651, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2957-4791
Leandro A Do NascimentoScience Department, biometrio.earth, Dr.-Schoenemann-Str. 38, Saarbrücken 66123 Deutschland, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8254-2900
Silke BauerSwiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, Birmensdorf CH-8903, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0844-164X

Funding

Aage V Jensen NaturfondBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeEuropean Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation programmeSwiss National Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects are the most diverse group of animals on Earth, yet our knowledge of their diversity, ecology and population trends remains abysmally poor. Four major technological approaches are coming to fruition for use in insect monitoring and ecological research-molecular methods, computer vision, autonomous acoustic monitoring and radar-based remote sensing-each of which has seen major advances over the past years. Together, they have the potential to revolutionize insect ecology, and to make all-taxa, fine-grained insect monitoring feasible across the globe. So far, advances within and among technologies have largely taken place in isolation, and parallel efforts among projects have led to redundancy and a methodological sprawl; yet, given the commonalities in their goals and approaches, increased collaboration among projects and integration across technologies could provide unprecedented improvements in taxonomic and spatio-temporal resolution and coverage. This theme issue showcases recent developments and state-of-the-art applications of these technologies, and outlines the way forward regarding data processing, cost-effectiveness, meaningful trend analysis, technological integration and open data requirements. Together, these papers set the stage for the future of automated insect monitoring. This article is part of the theme issue 'Towards a toolkit for global insect biodiversity monitoring'.

Indexed as

BiodiversityInsectaAnimalsBiological MonitoringRemote Sensing Technologyarthropodsecosystem healthinsectsmonitoring

Identifiers

PMID38705179
PMCPMC11070268

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.