Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38705879›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Differential analysis of histopathological and genetic markers of cancer aggressiveness, and survival difference in EBV-positive and EBV-negative prostate carcinoma.

Khalid Ahmed, Alisalman Sheikh, Saira Fatima, Tahira Ghulam, Ghulam Haider, Farhat Abbas, Antonio Sarria-Santamera, Kulsoom Ghias, Nouman Mughal, Syed Hani Abidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Khalid Ahmed *Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Alisalman Sheikh *Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Saira FatimaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Tahira GhulamDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ghulam HaiderDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Farhat AbbasDepartment of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Antonio Sarria-SantameraDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Kulsoom GhiasDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Nouman MughalDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. muhammad.nouman@aku.edu.
Syed Hani AbidiDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. m.haniabidi@gmail.com.

Funding

Aga Khan University PF172/0122Higher Education Commision, Pakistan 8722/Sindh/ NRPU/R&D/HEC/ 2017Nazarbayev University Social Policy grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have shown an association between prostate carcinoma (PCa) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV); however, none of the studies so far have identified the histopathological and genetic markers of cancer aggressiveness associated with EBV in PCa tissues. In this study, we used previously characterized EBV-PCR-positive (n = 39) and EBV-negative (n = 60) PCa tissues to perform an IHC-based assessment of key histopathological and molecular markers of PCa aggressiveness (EMT markers, AR expression, perineural invasion, and lymphocytic infiltration characterization). Additionally, we investigated the differential expression of key oncogenes, EMT-associated genes, and PCa-specific oncomiRs, in EBV-positive and -negative tissues, using the qPCR array. Finally, survival benefit analysis was also performed in EBV-positive and EBV-negative PCa patients. The EBV-positive PCa exhibited a higher percentage (80%) of perineural invasion (PNI) compared to EBV-negative PCa (67.3%) samples. Similarly, a higher lymphocytic infiltration was observed in EBV-LMP1-positive PCa samples. The subset characterization of T and B cell lymphocytic infiltration showed a trend of higher intratumoral and tumor stromal lymphocytic infiltration in EBV-negative tissues compared with EBV-positive tissues. The logistic regression analysis showed that EBV-positive status was associated with decreased odds (OR = 0.07; p-value < 0.019) of CD3 intratumoral lymphocytic infiltration in PCa tissues. The analysis of IHC-based expression patterns of EMT markers showed comparable expression of all EMT markers, except vimentin, which showed higher expression in EBV-positive PCa tissues compared to EBV-negative PCa tissues. Furthermore, gene expression analysis showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the expression of CDH1, AR, CHEK-2, CDKN-1B, and CDC-20 and oncomiRs miR-126, miR-152-3p, miR-452, miR-145-3p, miR-196a, miR-183-3p, and miR-146b in EBV-positive PCa tissues compared to EBV-negative PCa tissues. Overall, the survival proportion was comparable in both groups. The presence of EBV in the PCa tissues results in an increased expression of certain oncogenes, oncomiRs, and EMT marker (vimentin) and a decrease in CD3 ITL, which may be associated with the aggressive forms of PCa.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsHerpesvirus 4, HumanProstatic NeoplasmsAgedEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic MarkersHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessBiomarkers, TumorGenetic MarkersEBVEMT markersGene expressionGleason scoresLMP1OncogenesProstate carcinomaSurvival analysisTumor grade

Identifiers

PMID38705879
PMCPMC11070424

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.