Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38706202›Full record

GuidelineThe Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry2024

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists professional practice guidelines for the administration of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Salam Hussain, Suneel Chamoli, Paul Fitzgerald, Ashu Gandhi, Shane Gill, Shanthi Sarma, Colleen Loo

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Salam HussainDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9055-0510
Suneel ChamoliBinational Committee, Section of Electroconvulsive Therapy and Neurostimulation, The Royal Australian & New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1495-8282
Paul FitzgeraldSchool of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4217-8096
Ashu GandhiDepartment of Psychiatry, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Shane GillDiscipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7180-1807
Shanthi SarmaMental Health and Specialist Services, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0113-7415
Colleen LooSchool of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3267-0554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo provide guidance for the optimal administration of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, based on scientific evidence and supplemented by expert clinical consensus.

methodsArticles and information were sourced from existing guidelines and published literature. The findings were then formulated into consensus-based recommendations and guidance by the authors. The guidelines were subjected to rigorous successive consultation within the RANZCP, involving the Section of ECT and Neurostimulation (SEN) Committee, its broader membership and expert committees.

resultsThe RANZCP professional practice guidelines (PPG) for the administration of rTMS provide up-to-date advice regarding the use of rTMS in clinical practice. The guidelines are intended for use by psychiatrists and non-psychiatrists engaged in the administration of rTMS to facilitate best practice to optimise outcomes for patients. The guidelines strive to find the appropriate balance between promoting best evidence-based practice and acknowledging that evidence for rTMS use is a continually evolving.

conclusionThe guidelines provide up-to-date advice for psychiatrists and non-psychiatrists to promote optimal standards of rTMS practice.

Indexed as

PsychiatryTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAustraliaHumansNew ZealandPsychiatristsSocieties, MedicaldepressionGuidelinesneuromodulationneurostimulationprofessional practicepsychiatric disordersrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38706202
PMCPMC11308269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.