Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38706560›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024

Gut microbes differ in postmenopausal women responding to prunes to maintain hip bone mineral density.

Abigayle M R Simpson, Mary Jane De Souza, Janhavi Damani, Connie J Rogers, Nancy I Williams, Connie M Weaver, Mario G Ferruzzi, Cindy H Nakatsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Gut microbiome and bone health: update on mechanisms, clinical correlations, and possible treatment strategies.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Intermittent supplementation withFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abigayle M R SimpsonDepartment of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.
Mary Jane De SouzaDepartment of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, College Park, PA, United States.
Janhavi DamaniIntercollege Graduate Degree Program in Integrative and Biomedical Physiology, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, College Park, PA, United States.
Connie J RogersDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, College Park, PA, United States.
Nancy I WilliamsDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, College Park, PA, United States.
Connie M WeaverSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Mario G FerruzziArkansas Children's Nutrition Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Cindy H NakatsuDepartment of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foods high in phenolics such as prunes have been shown to exert protective effects on bone mineral density (BMD), but only certain individuals experience these benefits. This

Indexed as

bone mineral densitygut microbiomemenopauseosteopeniaosteoporosisphenolicspruneresponder

Identifiers

PMID38706560
PMCPMC11067506

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.