ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2024
Embracing the future: Integrating ChatGPT into China's nursing education system.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Meta-synthesis of nursing students' experiences with generative artificial intelligence-assisted learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Registered nurses' experiences with generative artificial intelligence: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- From adoption to interaction: examining human-GenAI engagement patterns, ethical tensions, and educational trade-offs in nursing education.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Nursing undergraduates' experiences of generative AI-assisted learning in the classroom environment: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Development and implementation of an ecological education model for evidence-based practice competency in undergraduate nursing students: A mixed-methods feasibility study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
- Deciphering AI-chatbots utilization in clinical practice, research and education among Chinese medical students in generative AI era: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Educational Applications of AI-Based Chatbots in Nursing: A Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Applications, attitudes and ethical considerations of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI) in nursing education: a scoping review.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Mapping research trends and competency domains in nursing-related digital and artificial intelligence technologies: A bibliometric analysis.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Review
- Nursing Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Retrieval augmented generation for nursing question answering with large language models.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Article
- Factors associated with intention to use generative artificial intelligence in nursing practice: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Large Language Models in Nursing Education: Concept Analysis.JMIR nursing · 2025Review
- ChatGPT Applications in Nursing: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Nursing open · 2025Review
- Evaluating ChatGPT-4omni in paediatric developmental screening: direct versus sequential prompts.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Embracing AI in academia: A mixed methods study of nursing students' and educators' perspectives on using ChatGPT.PloS one · 2025Article
- Rapid review on GenAI in nursing education.Frontiers in health services · 2025Review
- The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of generative artificial intelligence: a qualitative study of undergraduate nursing students.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Knowledge and attitudes toward artificial intelligence in nursing among various categories of professionals in China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article delves into the role of ChatGPT within the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence, especially highlighting its significant potential in nursing education. Initially, the paper presents the notable advancements ChatGPT has achieved in facilitating interactive learning and providing real-time feedback, along with the academic community's growing interest in this technology. Subsequently, summarizing the research outcomes of ChatGPT's applications in nursing education, including various clinical disciplines and scenarios, showcases the enormous potential for multidisciplinary education and addressing clinical issues. Comparing the performance of several Large Language Models (LLMs) on China's National Nursing Licensure Examination, we observed that ChatGPT demonstrated a higher accuracy rate than its counterparts, providing a solid theoretical foundation for its application in Chinese nursing education and clinical settings. Educational institutions should establish a targeted and effective regulatory framework to leverage ChatGPT in localized nursing education while assuming corresponding responsibilities. Through standardized training for users and adjustments to existing educational assessment methods aimed at preventing potential misuse and abuse, the full potential of ChatGPT as an innovative auxiliary tool in China's nursing education system can be realized, aligning with the developmental needs of modern teaching methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.