Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38708406›Full record

ArticleNature cardiovascular research2024

The BulkECexplorer compiles endothelial bulk transcriptomes to predict functional versus leaky transcription.

James T Brash, Guillermo Diez-Pinel, Chiara Colletto, Raphael F P Castellan, Alessandro Fantin, Christiana Ruhrberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cardiovascular research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James T BrashUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
Guillermo Diez-PinelUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2297-4776
Chiara CollettoDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Raphael F P CastellanUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
Alessandro FantinUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5517-6068
Christiana RuhrbergUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3212-9381

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/18/85/34127British Heart Foundation PG/19/37/34399Medical Research Council MR/N011511/1Wellcome Trust 205099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptomic data can be mined to understand the molecular activity of cell types. Yet, functional genes may remain undetected in RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) experiments for technical reasons, such as insufficient read depth or gene dropout. Conversely, RNA-seq experiments may detect lowly expressed mRNAs thought to be biologically irrelevant products of leaky transcription. To represent a cell type's functional transcriptome more accurately, we propose compiling many bulk RNA-seq datasets into a compendium and applying established classification models to predict whether detected transcripts are likely products of active or leaky transcription. Here, we present the BulkECexplorer (bulk RNA-seq endothelial cell explorer) compendium of 240 bulk RNA-seq datasets from five vascular endothelial cell subtypes. This resource reports transcript counts for genes of interest and predicts whether detected transcripts are likely the products of active or leaky gene expression. Beyond its usefulness for vascular biology research, this resource provides a blueprint for developing analogous tools for other cell types.

Identifiers

PMID38708406
PMCPMC7615926

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.