Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38712040›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Genotype Representation Graphs: Enabling Efficient Analysis of Biobank-Scale Data.

Drew DeHaas, Ziqing Pan, Xinzhu Wei

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Drew DeHaasDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Ziqing PanDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Xinzhu WeiDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Funding

Dissecting the genetics and evolution of complex traits using whole-genome genealogiesR35GM150579 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Xinzhu Wei · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM150579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational analysis of a large number of genomes requires a data structure that can represent the dataset compactly while also enabling efficient operations on variants and samples. Current practice is to store large-scale genetic polymorphism data using tabular data structures and file formats, where rows and columns represent samples and genetic variants. However, encoding genetic data in such formats has become unsustainable. For example, the UK Biobank polymorphism data of 200,000 phased whole genomes has exceeded 350 terabytes (TB) in Variant Call Format (VCF), cumbersome and inefficient to work with. To mitigate the computational burden, we introduce the Genotype Representation Graph (GRG), an extremely compact data structure to losslessly present phased whole-genome polymorphisms. A GRG is a fully connected hierarchical graph that exploits variant-sharing across samples, leveraging ideas inspired by Ancestral Recombination Graphs. Capturing variant-sharing in a multitree structure compresses biobank-scale human data to the point where it can fit in a typical server's RAM (5-26 gigabytes (GB) per chromosome), and enables graph-traversal algorithms to trivially reuse computed values, both of which can significantly reduce computation time. We have developed a command-line tool and a library usable via both C++ and Python for constructing and processing GRG files which scales to a million whole genomes. It takes 160GB disk space to encode the information in 200,000 UK Biobank phased whole genomes as a GRG, more than 13 times smaller than the size of compressed VCF. We show that summaries of genetic variants such as allele frequency and association effect can be computed on GRG via graph traversal that runs significantly faster than all tested alternatives, including

Identifiers

PMID38712040
PMCPMC11071416

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.