ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
A complete map of specificity encoding for a partially fuzzy protein interaction.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thousands of human proteins function by binding short linear motifs embedded in intrinsically disordered regions. How affinity and specificity are encoded in these binding domains and the motifs themselves is not well understood. The evolvability of binding specificity - how rapidly and extensively it can change upon mutation - is also largely unexplored, as is the contribution of 'fuzzy' dynamic residues to affinity and specificity in protein-protein interactions. Here we report the first complete map of specificity encoding for a globular protein domain. Quantifying >200,000 energetic interactions between a PDZ domain and its ligand identifies 20 major energetically coupled pairs of sites that control specificity. These are organized into six modules, with most mutations in each module reprogramming specificity for a single position in the ligand. Nine of the major energetic couplings controlling specificity are between structural contacts and 11 have an allosteric mechanism of action. The dynamic tail of the ligand is more robust to mutation than the structured residues but contributes additively to binding affinity and communicates with structured residues to enable changes in specificity. Our results quantify the binding specificities of >1,800 globular proteins to reveal how specificity is encoded and provide a direct comparison of the encoding of affinity and specificity in structured and dynamic molecular recognition.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.