Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38713708›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2024

Deciphering novel TCF4-driven mechanisms underlying a common triplet repeat expansion-mediated disease.

Nihar Bhattacharyya, Niuzheng Chai, Nathaniel J Hafford-Tear, Amanda N Sadan, Anita Szabo, Christina Zarouchlioti, Jana Jedlickova, Szi Kay Leung, Tianyi Liao, Lubica Dudakova and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Longitudinal Study ofMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Nihar BhattacharyyaUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6496-2431
Niuzheng ChaiUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-0144-9737
Nathaniel J Hafford-TearUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Amanda N SadanUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Anita SzaboUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Christina ZarouchliotiUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5096-177X
Jana JedlickovaDepartment of Paediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1769-1659
Szi Kay LeungFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Tianyi LiaoUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Lubica DudakovaDepartment of Paediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4718-8955
Pavlina SkalickaDepartment of Paediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Mohit ParekhUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5186-068X
Ismail MoghulUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3653-2327
Aaron R JeffriesFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Michael E CheethamUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Kirithika MuthusamyMoorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Alison J HardcastleUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Nikolas PontikosUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1782-4711
Petra LiskovaDepartment of Paediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7834-8486
Stephen J TuftUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9385-220X
Alice E DavidsonUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1816-6151

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is an age-related cause of vision loss, and the most common repeat expansion-mediated disease in humans characterised to date. Up to 80% of European FECD cases have been attributed to expansion of a non-coding CTG repeat element (termed CTG18.1) located within the ubiquitously expressed transcription factor encoding gene, TCF4. The non-coding nature of the repeat and the transcriptomic complexity of TCF4 have made it extremely challenging to experimentally decipher the molecular mechanisms underlying this disease. Here we comprehensively describe CTG18.1 expansion-driven molecular components of disease within primary patient-derived corneal endothelial cells (CECs), generated from a large cohort of individuals with CTG18.1-expanded (Exp+) and CTG 18.1-independent (Exp-) FECD. We employ long-read, short-read, and spatial transcriptomic techniques to interrogate expansion-specific transcriptomic biomarkers. Interrogation of long-read sequencing and alternative splicing analysis of short-read transcriptomic data together reveals the global extent of altered splicing occurring within Exp+ FECD, and unique transcripts associated with CTG18.1-expansions. Similarly, differential gene expression analysis highlights the total transcriptomic consequences of Exp+ FECD within CECs. Furthermore, differential exon usage, pathway enrichment and spatial transcriptomics reveal TCF4 isoform ratio skewing solely in Exp+ FECD with potential downstream functional consequences. Lastly, exome data from 134 Exp- FECD cases identified rare (minor allele frequency <0.005) and potentially deleterious (CADD>15) TCF4 variants in 7/134 FECD Exp- cases, suggesting that TCF4 variants independent of CTG18.1 may increase FECD risk. In summary, our study supports the hypothesis that at least two distinct pathogenic mechanisms, RNA toxicity and TCF4 isoform-specific dysregulation, both underpin the pathophysiology of FECD. We anticipate these data will inform and guide the development of translational interventions for this common triplet-repeat mediated disease.

Indexed as

Fuchs' Endothelial DystrophyTranscription Factor 4Trinucleotide Repeat ExpansionAlternative SplicingEndothelial CellsEndothelium, CornealFemaleHumansMaleTranscriptomeTCF4 protein, humanTranscription Factor 4

Identifiers

PMID38713708
PMCPMC11101122

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.