Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38713821›Full record

ArticleMedical anthropology2024

Who We Test For: Aligning Relational and Public Health Responsibilities in COVID-19 Testing in Scotland.

Imogen Bevan, Linda Bauld, Alice Street

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical anthropology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Imogen BevanSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1835-4141
Linda BauldUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7411-4260
Alice StreetSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7874-0234

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W006243/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 testing programs in the UK often called on people to test to "protect others." In this article we explore motivations to test and the relationships to "others" involved in an asymptomatic testing program at a Scottish university. We show that participants engaged with testing as a relational technology, through which they navigated multiple overlapping responsibilities to kin, colleagues, flatmates, strangers, and to more diffuse publics. We argue that the success of testing as a technique of governance depends not only on the production of disciplined selves, but also on the program's capacity to align interpersonal and public scales of responsibility.

Indexed as

Anthropology, MedicalCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingPublic HealthAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotivationSARS-CoV-2ScotlandCOVID-19diagnosispandemicpublic healthScotlandtesting

Identifiers

PMID38713821
PMCPMC11104742

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.