Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38714934›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

An analysis of factors influencing cognitive dysfunction among older adults in Northwest China based on logistic regression and decision tree modelling.

Yu Wang, Li Dou, Ni Wang, Yanjie Zhao, Yuqin Nie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu WangZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, No.158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, 310014, People's Republic of China.
Li DouThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, No. 38, North 2nd Lane, Nanhu East Road, Shuimogou District, Urumqi City, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, 830063, People's Republic of China.
Ni WangSchool of Nursing, Xinjiang Medical University, No.567 Shangde North Road, Urumqi City, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, 830000, People's Republic of China.
Yanjie ZhaoSchool of Nursing, Xinjiang Medical University, No.567 Shangde North Road, Urumqi City, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, 830000, People's Republic of China.
Yuqin NieThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, No. 38, North 2nd Lane, Nanhu East Road, Shuimogou District, Urumqi City, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, 830063, People's Republic of China. 2640336850@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive dysfunction is one of the leading causes of disability and dependence in older adults and is a major economic burden on the public health system. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors for cognitive dysfunction and their predictive value in older adults in Northwest China.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using a multistage sampling method. The questionnaires were distributed through the Elderly Disability Monitoring Platform to older adults aged 60 years and above in Northwest China, who were divided into cognitive dysfunction and normal cognitive function groups. In addition to univariate analyses, logistic regression and decision tree modelling were used to construct a model to identify factors that can predict the occurrence of cognitive dysfunction in older adults.

resultsA total of 12,494 valid questionnaires were collected, including 2617 from participants in the cognitive dysfunction group and 9877 from participants in the normal cognitive function group. Univariate analysis revealed that ethnicity, BMI, age, educational attainment, marital status, type of residence, residency status, current work status, main economic source, type of chronic disease, long-term use of medication, alcohol consumption, participation in social activities, exercise status, social support, total scores on the Balanced Test Assessment, total scores on the Gait Speed Assessment total score, and activities of daily living (ADL) were significantly different between the two groups (all P < 0.05). According to logistic regression analyses, ethnicity, BMI, educational attainment, marital status, residency, main source of income, chronic diseases, annual medical examination, alcohol consumption, exercise status, total scores on the Balanced Test Assessment, and activities of daily living (ADLs) were found to influence cognitive dysfunction in older adults (all P < 0.05). In the decision tree model, the ability to perform activities of daily living was the root node, followed by total scores on the Balanced Test Assessment, marital status, educational attainment, age, annual medical examination, and ethnicity.

conclusionsTraditional risk factors (including BMI, literacy, and alcohol consumption) and potentially modifiable risk factors (including balance function, ability to care for oneself in daily life, and widowhood) have a significant impact on the increased risk of cognitive dysfunction in older adults in Northwest China. The use of decision tree models can help health care workers better assess cognitive function in older adults and develop personalized interventions. Further research could help to gain insight into the mechanisms of cognitive dysfunction and provide new avenues for prevention and intervention.

Indexed as

Decision TreesActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overChinaCognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesCognitive dysfunctionDecision treeOlder peopleRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38714934
PMCPMC11077840

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.