Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38717809›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2024

A Web-Based Peer Support Network to Help Care Partners of People With Serious Illness: Co-Design Study.

Elizabeth A O'Donnell, Aricca D Van Citters, Inas S Khayal, Matthew M Wilson, David Gustafson, Amber E Barnato, Andrea C Buccellato, Colleen Young, Megan M Holthoff, Eugene Korsunskiy and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Elizabeth A O'Donnell *Communications, Marketing and Community Health, Alice Peck Day Memorial Hospital, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-3367-4450
Aricca D Van Citters *The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2961-5661
Inas S KhayalThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8354-6006
Matthew M WilsonPalliative Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2195-6429
David GustafsonCollege of Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9787-6428
Amber E BarnatoThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1080-6270
Andrea C BuccellatoDartmouth Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-4455-7544
Colleen YoungMayo Clinic Connect, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9377-7868
Megan M HolthoffThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0347-2439
Eugene KorsunskiyThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-0368-0579
Stephanie C TomlinPatient and Family Advisors, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2899-1884
Amelia M CullinanPalliative Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-0318-3495
Alexandra C SteinbaughSection of Palliative Medicine, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-7645-8555
Jennifer J HinsonPatient and Family Advisors, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-8922-7971
Kristen R JohnsonSection of Palliative Medicine, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-4874-1959
Andrew WilliamsPatient and Family Advisors, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-6994-8076
Ruth M ThomsonPalliative Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-0009-3848
Janet M HainesPatient and Family Advisors, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-5854-562X
Anne B HolmesPatient and Family Advisors, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-1663-4050
Ann D BradleyPatient and Family Advisors, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-8229-4871
Eugene C NelsonThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7991-7836
Kathryn B KirklandThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9851-926X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare partners of people with serious illness experience significant challenges and unmet needs during the patient's treatment period and after their death. Learning from others with shared experiences can be valuable, but opportunities are not consistently available.

objectiveThis study aims to design and prototype a regional, facilitated, and web-based peer support network to help active and bereaved care partners of persons with serious illness be better prepared to cope with the surprises that arise during serious illness and in bereavement.

methodsAn 18-member co-design team included active care partners and those in bereavement, people who had experienced serious illness, regional health care and support partners, and clinicians. It was guided by facilitators and peer network subject-matter experts. We conducted design exercises to identify the functions and specifications of a peer support network. Co-design members independently prioritized network specifications, which were incorporated into an early iteration of the web-based network.

resultsThe team prioritized two functions: (1) connecting care partners to information and (2) facilitating emotional support. The design process generated 24 potential network specifications to support these functions. The highest priorities included providing a supportive and respectful community; connecting people to trusted resources; reducing barriers to asking for help; and providing frequently asked questions and responses. The network platform had to be simple and intuitive, provide technical support for users, protect member privacy, provide publicly available information and a private discussion forum, and be easily accessible. It was feasible to enroll members in the ConnectShareCare web-based network over a 3-month period.

conclusionsA co-design process supported the identification of critical features of a peer support network for care partners of people with serious illnesses in a rural setting, as well as initial testing and use. Further testing is underway to assess the long-term viability and impact of the network.

Indexed as

InternetPeer GroupSocial SupportCaregiversCritical IllnessHumansactive carebereaved carebereavementcaregivercaregiverscaregivingcare partnerscare providercare providerscliniciancliniciansemotional supportengineering designfunctionfunctionshuman-centered designimpactinformationmortalityonline networkonline support networkpeer supportprivacy protectionquality of liferuralserious illnessspecificationtechnical supporttertiary careunmet needunmet needsviabilityvirtual network

Identifiers

PMID38717809
PMCPMC11112480

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.