Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38721077›Full record

ArticleJMA journal2024

Real-world Settings for the Surgical Treatment of Neurofibroma in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

Mayumi Ota, Yoshimasa Nobeyama, Akihiko Asahina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMA journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mayumi OtaDepartment of Dermatology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshimasa NobeyamaDepartment of Dermatology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiko AsahinaDepartment of Dermatology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Even though an MEK inhibitor has been recently launched, neurofibroma still negatively affects the well-being of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in restricted access to medical care. The present study was conducted to investigate the real-world settings of patients with NF1 who underwent surgery with or without restricted medical access during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Based on data obtained from medical records, the present study examined 123 and 260 patients who underwent surgery for neurofibromas with and without restricted medical access, respectively. Results: The mean numbers of surgeries performed during the periods with and without restricted medical access were 5.8 and 9.8 per month, respectively, and there were 1.18- and 1.46-fold more female patients than male patients for each group, respectively. Regardless of whether medical access was restricted, the majority of patients who underwent surgery were middle-aged females with multiple or severe neurofibromas and mild extracutaneous symptoms. Tumor burden was the most common reason for surgery. However, cutaneous neurofibromas were more likely to be treated than plexiform neurofibromas under restricted medical access. Conclusions: Patients with NF1, particularly middle-aged females with severe cutaneous manifestations and mild extracutaneous manifestations, still underwent surgery for neurofibromas regardless of whether medical access was restricted.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicmedical accessneurofibromaneurofibromatosis type 1surgerytumor burden

Identifiers

PMID38721077
PMCPMC11074565

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.