Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38722347›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2024

Systematic evaluation of high-throughput PBK modelling strategies for the prediction of intravenous and oral pharmacokinetics in humans.

René Geci, Domenico Gadaleta, Marina García de Lomana, Rita Ortega-Vallbona, Erika Colombo, Eva Serrano-Candelas, Alicia Paini, Lars Kuepfer, Stephan Schaller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Open Systems Pharmacology Community Conference (OSP-CC) Proceedings 2025.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advancing systemic toxicity risk assessment: Evaluation of a NAM-based toolbox approach.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

René GeciesqLABS GmbH, Saterland, Germany. rene.geci@esqlabs.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1219-6835
Domenico GadaletaIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Marina García de LomanaMachine Learning Research, Research and Development, Pharmaceuticals, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Rita Ortega-VallbonaProtoQSAR SL, CEEI (Centro Europeo de Empresas Innovadoras), Valencia, Spain.
Erika ColomboIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Eva Serrano-CandelasProtoQSAR SL, CEEI (Centro Europeo de Empresas Innovadoras), Valencia, Spain.
Alicia PainiesqLABS GmbH, Saterland, Germany.
Lars Kuepfer *Institute for Systems Medicine with Focus on Organ Interaction, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Stephan Schaller *esqLABS GmbH, Saterland, Germany.

Funding

H2020 Societal Challenges 963845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling offers a mechanistic basis for predicting the pharmaco-/toxicokinetics of compounds and thereby provides critical information for integrating toxicity and exposure data to replace animal testing with in vitro or in silico methods. However, traditional PBK modelling depends on animal and human data, which limits its usefulness for non-animal methods. To address this limitation, high-throughput PBK modelling aims to rely exclusively on in vitro and in silico data for model generation. Here, we evaluate a variety of in silico tools and different strategies to parameterise PBK models with input values from various sources in a high-throughput manner. We gather 2000 + publicly available human in vivo concentration-time profiles of 200 + compounds (IV and oral administration), as well as in silico, in vitro and in vivo determined compound-specific parameters required for the PBK modelling of these compounds. Then, we systematically evaluate all possible PBK model parametrisation strategies in PK-Sim and quantify their prediction accuracy against the collected in vivo concentration-time profiles. Our results show that even simple, generic high-throughput PBK modelling can provide accurate predictions of the pharmacokinetics of most compounds (87% of Cmax and 84% of AUC within tenfold). Nevertheless, we also observe major differences in prediction accuracies between the different parameterisation strategies, as well as between different compounds. Finally, we outline a strategy for high-throughput PBK modelling that relies exclusively on freely available tools. Our findings contribute to a more robust understanding of the reliability of high-throughput PBK modelling, which is essential to establish the confidence necessary for its utilisation in Next-Generation Risk Assessment.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalAdministration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAnimalsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacokineticsPharmaceutical PreparationsHigh-throughput PBK modellingNew approach methodologies (NAMs)Next-generation risk assessment (NGRA)PharmacokineticsPhysiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling

Identifiers

PMID38722347
PMCPMC11272695

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.