Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2024
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Therapy and Manual Pelvic Fascial Release in Treating Myofascial Pelvic Pain.
Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiofrequency Versus Myofascial Therapy in Women With Myofascial Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.International urogynecology journal · 2026Trial
- Monopolar Capacitive-Resistive Radiofrequency for Pelvic Floor Hypertonia and Vaginismus: A Case Series.Cureus · 2026Article
- Myofascial release and fascial-targeted mechanical interventions in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: mechanisms, modalities, and integrative physiology.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Matrix Radiofrequency Combined with Myofascial Manipulation in the Treatment of Myofascial Pelvic Pain: A Retrospective Study.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of Radiofrequency in Multimodal Physiotherapy for Postpartum Pelvic Pain: The RASDOP Protocol-A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Investigating the effects of using Tecar therapy with biofeedback compared to biofeedback alone in the treatment of fecal incontinence in children aged 4 to 16 years: a randomized clinical trial study.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2025Article
- Pain Management for Postpartum Pain: A Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
- Application progress of radiofrequency (RF) therapy in pelvic floor disorders (PFDs): a narrative review focusing on randomized controlled trials.Gynecology and pelvic medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisMyofascial pelvic pain (MFPP), characterized by sensitive trigger points in the pelvic floor muscles, leads to chronic pain and affects various aspects of life. Despite the availability of different treatment modalities, there is limited comparative research on their effectiveness. This study compares radiofrequency (RF) therapy and myofascial manual therapy (MMT) in treating MFPP. We aimed to evaluate pelvic floor muscle strength changes, clinical symptoms, and patient comfort during treatment.
methodsThe study involved 176 participants, divided equally into RF and MMT groups. We assessed pelvic floor pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), muscle strength using the Modified Oxford Scale (MOS) and surface electromyography (sEMG), clinical symptom improvement through questionnaires, and patient discomfort during treatment.
resultsBoth RF and MMT groups significantly reduced pelvic floor and paraurethral muscle pain (VAS scores, p < 0.001). RF treatment significantly decreased vaginal laxity in its group (p < 0.001), with no notable change in the MMT group (p = 0.818). RF therapy also resulted in greater patient comfort than MMT (p < 0.001). Although both treatments improved clinical symptoms, there was no significant difference between the two (p = 0.692). MOS scores and pelvic floor sEMG values showed no significant differences between the groups before and after treatment (p > 0.05).
conclusionsBoth RF and MMT effectively alleviate pelvic floor pain and improve clinical symptoms in MFPP patients. RF therapy, however, offers additional benefits in reducing vaginal laxity and enhancing treatment comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38722560What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.