Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38723004›Full record

Trial reportMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association2025

Peer support during in vivo exposure homework increases likelihood of prolonged exposure therapy completion.

Melba A Hernandez-Tejada, Madeline J Bruce, Wendy Muzzy, Anna Birks, Giovanni Macedo E Cordeiro, Stephanie M Hart, Stephanie Hamski, Ron Acierno

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melba A Hernandez-TejadaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.
Madeline J BruceDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.
Wendy MuzzyDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Anna BirksDepartment of Psychiatry, Ralph H. Johnson VA Health Care System, Charleston, South Carolina.
Giovanni Macedo E CordeiroResearch, Institute of Education and Research, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Stephanie M HartDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Stephanie HamskiDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Ron AciernoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.

Funding

Department of Defense BA160297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure-based treatments such as prolonged exposure therapy (PE) are effective for veterans with PTSD. However, dropout rates as high as 50% are common. The Department of Veterans Affairs employs peers to increase mental health treatment engagement, however peers are not routinely used to help patients complete PE homework assignments. The present study included 109 veterans who decided to drop out from exposure-based treatment after completing seven or fewer sessions and used a randomized controlled design to compare PE treatment completion rates in response to 2 forms of peer support: (1) standard weekly telephone-based peer support vs. (2) peer-assisted in vivo exposure, wherein peers accompanied veterans (virtually or in person) during a limited number of in vivo exposure assignments. There were no differences between instrumental vs general peer support conditions as randomized. However, post hoc analyses indicated that 87% of those who completed at least one peer-assisted in vivo exposure completed treatment, compared to 56% of those not completing any peer-assisted in vivo exposure. The dose effect of peer-assisted in vivo exposure increased to 93% with 2 or more peer-assisted exposures, and 97% with 3 or more peer-assisted exposures. The present study suggests that augmenting PE with instrumental peer support during in vivo exposure homework may reduce dropout if completed. Future research should test whether the impact of peer-assisted in vivo exposure is enhanced when offered at the beginning of treatment as opposed to waiting until the point of dropout.

Indexed as

Implosive TherapyPatient DropoutsPeer GroupSocial SupportStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticVeteransAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited Statesin vivo exposurePEPeer supporttreatment completionveterans

Identifiers

PMID38723004
PMCPMC12413055

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.