ArticleVisual neuroscience2024
Chemically induced cone degeneration in the 13-lined ground squirrel.
Article in Visual neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative Markers of Neural Changes, Retinal Thickness, and Responses to Electrical Stimulation in Retinal Degeneration.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Druggable Genome Mendelian Randomization and GWAS-sceQTLs MR Analysis Reveal Genetic Associations Between Open-Angle Glaucoma and Immune Cells, and Identify Potential Drugs.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the repeatability of the multifocal electroretinogram in the cone dominant 13-lined ground squirrel.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Seasonal Variation in ATP-Induced Retinal Damage in the Cone-Dominant 13-Lined Ground Squirrel.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Causal associations between smoking and ocular diseases: a Mendelian randomization study.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animal models of retinal degeneration are critical for understanding disease and testing potential therapies. Inducing degeneration commonly involves the administration of chemicals that kill photoreceptors by disrupting metabolic pathways, signaling pathways, or protein synthesis. While chemically induced degeneration has been demonstrated in a variety of animals (mice, rats, rabbits, felines, 13-lined ground squirrels (13-LGS), pigs, chicks), few studies have used noninvasive high-resolution retinal imaging to monitor the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.