Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38725963›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in food science2024

A critical review of the bioactive ingredients and biological functions of

Peiju Qin, Junjun Shen, Jeigen Wei, Yuqi Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in food science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Terpenoids fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Drought Resistance Evaluation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peiju QinHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Forestry Biotechnology & International, Cooperation Base of Science and Technology Innovation on Forest Resource, Biotechnology, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China.
Junjun ShenHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Forestry Biotechnology & International, Cooperation Base of Science and Technology Innovation on Forest Resource, Biotechnology, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China.
Jeigen WeiHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Forestry Biotechnology & International, Cooperation Base of Science and Technology Innovation on Forest Resource, Biotechnology, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China.
Yuqi ChenHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Forestry Biotechnology & International, Cooperation Base of Science and Technology Innovation on Forest Resource, Biotechnology, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Bioactive componentBiological functionsCamellia oleifera oilExtraction method

Identifiers

PMID38725963
PMCPMC11081779

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.