Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38726243›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2024

Witness for resolution: post-conflict quadratic affiliation in semi-free ranging pigs.

Ivan Norscia, Edoardo Collarini, Carlo Robino, Elena Chierto, Giada Cordoni

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ivan NorsciaDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1618-7717
Edoardo CollariniDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Torino, C.So Galileo Galilei 22, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0789-4089
Carlo RobinoDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Torino, C.So Galileo Galilei 22, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1187-7732
Elena ChiertoDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Torino, C.So Galileo Galilei 22, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0365-6737
Giada CordoniDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7093-0025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In social mammals, post-conflict resolution can involve the reunion of former opponents (reconciliation), spontaneous/solicited post-conflict affiliation of a third party with either opponent (triadic contacts), and affiliation between other individuals (hereafter bystanders; quadratic contacts). Quadratic contacts-possibly informing complex cognitive abilities-have been neglected in post-conflict studies. We investigated quadratic affiliation in semi-free ranging pigs

Indexed as

anxiety reductionemotional regulationreconciliationsocial appraisaltriadic contacts

Identifiers

PMID38726243
PMCPMC11078055

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.