ArticleBlood2025
How I treat challenging transfusion cases in sickle cell disease.
Article in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibody-Dependent and Antibody-Independent Hemolysis in Sickle Cell Disease.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Blood Transfusion and ABO Blood Groups in Sickle Cell Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Global Prevalence of Alloimmunization in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease Receiving Red Blood Cell Transfusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Improving CORM technology for the treatment of delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction.HemaSphere · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractTransfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) can be lifesaving for individuals living with sickle cell disease (SCD). However, alloimmunization after transfusion is more common with patients with SCD than in other patient populations, resulting in morbidity and mortality. Management of complications related to RBC alloantibodies, including delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions (DHTRs) and identifying compatible RBCs for future transfusions, remains a challenge for hematologists and transfusion medicine providers. Although transfusion guidelines from organizations, including the American Society for Hematology provide general recommendations, individual cases remain challenging. Antibody evanescence and the lack of widespread RBC alloantibody data sharing across hospitals pose unique challenges, as do RH variants in both transfusion recipients and blood donors. Further, as potentially curative therapies require RBC transfusions to lower the hemoglobin S before cellular therapy collections and infusions, patients who are highly alloimmunized may be deemed ineligible. The cases described are representative of clinical dilemmas the authors have encountered, and the approaches are as evidence-based as the literature and the authors' experiences allow. A future desired state is one in which RBC alloantibody data are efficiently shared across institutions, Rh alloimmunization can be mitigated, better treatments exist for DHTRs, and a label of difficult to transfuse does not prevent desired therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.