Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38728685›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Development and Validation of an Explainable Deep Learning Model to Predict In-Hospital Mortality for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

Puguang Xie, Hao Wang, Jun Xiao, Fan Xu, Jingyang Liu, Zihang Chen, Weijie Zhao, Siyu Hou, Dongdong Wu, Yu Ma and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Puguang XieChongqing Emergency Medical Centre, Chongqing University Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6380-7472
Hao WangChongqing Emergency Medical Centre, Chongqing University Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6394-2757
Jun XiaoChongqing Emergency Medical Centre, Chongqing University Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1195-1031
Fan XuChongqing Emergency Medical Centre, Chongqing University Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0009-0004-7312-8627
Jingyang LiuChongqing Emergency Medical Centre, Chongqing University Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0009-0006-8105-2989
Zihang ChenBioengineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7437-7850
Weijie ZhaoBioengineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0009-0003-1346-4947
Siyu HouBio-Med Informatics Research Centre & Clinical Research Centre, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0009-0005-7431-0436
Dongdong WuMedical Big Data Research Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7826-5963
Yu Ma *Chongqing Emergency Medical Centre, Chongqing University Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2175-3346
Jingjing Xiao *Bio-Med Informatics Research Centre & Clinical Research Centre, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5020-638X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most severe cardiovascular diseases and is associated with a high risk of in-hospital mortality. However, the current deep learning models for in-hospital mortality prediction lack interpretability.

objectiveThis study aims to establish an explainable deep learning model to provide individualized in-hospital mortality prediction and risk factor assessment for patients with AMI.

methodsIn this retrospective multicenter study, we used data for consecutive patients hospitalized with AMI from the Chongqing University Central Hospital between July 2016 and December 2022 and the Electronic Intensive Care Unit Collaborative Research Database. These patients were randomly divided into training (7668/10,955, 70%) and internal test (3287/10,955, 30%) data sets. In addition, data of patients with AMI from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database were used for external validation. Deep learning models were used to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with AMI, and they were compared with linear and tree-based models. The Shapley Additive Explanations method was used to explain the model with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in both the internal test and external validation data sets to quantify and visualize the features that drive predictions.

resultsA total of 10,955 patients with AMI who were admitted to Chongqing University Central Hospital or included in the Electronic Intensive Care Unit Collaborative Research Database were randomly divided into a training data set of 7668 (70%) patients and an internal test data set of 3287 (30%) patients. A total of 9355 patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database were included for independent external validation. In-hospital mortality occurred in 8.74% (670/7668), 8.73% (287/3287), and 9.12% (853/9355) of the patients in the training, internal test, and external validation cohorts, respectively. The Self-Attention and Intersample Attention Transformer model performed best in both the internal test data set and the external validation data set among the 9 prediction models, with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86 (95% CI 0.84-0.88) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.84-0.87), respectively. Older age, high heart rate, and low body temperature were the 3 most important predictors of increased mortality, according to the explanations of the Self-Attention and Intersample Attention Transformer model.

conclusionsThe explainable deep learning model that we developed could provide estimates of mortality and visual contribution of the features to the prediction for a patient with AMI. The explanations suggested that older age, unstable vital signs, and metabolic disorders may increase the risk of mortality in patients with AMI.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHospital MortalityMyocardial InfarctionAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsROC Curveacute myocardial infarctiondeep learningexplainable modelmortalityprediction

Identifiers

PMID38728685
PMCPMC11127140

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.