ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024
Development and Validation of an Explainable Deep Learning Model to Predict In-Hospital Mortality for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global trends of big data analytics in health research: a bibliometric study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Establishment and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for in-hospital mortality risk in acute myocardial infarction patients complicated with diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mortality after Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Unlocking the potential of real-time ICU mortality prediction: redefining risk assessment with continuous data recovery.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of the Charlson Comorbidity Index for Mortality and Machine Learning-Based Prediction in Critically Ill Patients with Paralytic Ileus: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Application of the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers Model for Predicting the Abbreviated Injury Scale in Patients with Trauma: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Explainable Predictive Model for Suicidal Ideation During COVID-19: Social Media Discourse Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most severe cardiovascular diseases and is associated with a high risk of in-hospital mortality. However, the current deep learning models for in-hospital mortality prediction lack interpretability.
objectiveThis study aims to establish an explainable deep learning model to provide individualized in-hospital mortality prediction and risk factor assessment for patients with AMI.
methodsIn this retrospective multicenter study, we used data for consecutive patients hospitalized with AMI from the Chongqing University Central Hospital between July 2016 and December 2022 and the Electronic Intensive Care Unit Collaborative Research Database. These patients were randomly divided into training (7668/10,955, 70%) and internal test (3287/10,955, 30%) data sets. In addition, data of patients with AMI from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database were used for external validation. Deep learning models were used to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with AMI, and they were compared with linear and tree-based models. The Shapley Additive Explanations method was used to explain the model with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in both the internal test and external validation data sets to quantify and visualize the features that drive predictions.
resultsA total of 10,955 patients with AMI who were admitted to Chongqing University Central Hospital or included in the Electronic Intensive Care Unit Collaborative Research Database were randomly divided into a training data set of 7668 (70%) patients and an internal test data set of 3287 (30%) patients. A total of 9355 patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database were included for independent external validation. In-hospital mortality occurred in 8.74% (670/7668), 8.73% (287/3287), and 9.12% (853/9355) of the patients in the training, internal test, and external validation cohorts, respectively. The Self-Attention and Intersample Attention Transformer model performed best in both the internal test data set and the external validation data set among the 9 prediction models, with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86 (95% CI 0.84-0.88) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.84-0.87), respectively. Older age, high heart rate, and low body temperature were the 3 most important predictors of increased mortality, according to the explanations of the Self-Attention and Intersample Attention Transformer model.
conclusionsThe explainable deep learning model that we developed could provide estimates of mortality and visual contribution of the features to the prediction for a patient with AMI. The explanations suggested that older age, unstable vital signs, and metabolic disorders may increase the risk of mortality in patients with AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.