Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38730406›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2024

Machine learning-based prediction models affecting the recovery of postoperative bowel function for patients undergoing colorectal surgeries.

Shuguang Yang, Huiying Zhao, Youzhong An, Fuzheng Guo, Hua Zhang, Zhidong Gao, Yingjiang Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shuguang Yang *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, P.R. China.
Huiying ZhaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, P.R. China.
Youzhong AnDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, P.R. China.
Fuzheng Guo *Trauma Center, Peking University People's Hospital, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration (Ministry of Education), Beijing, China.
Hua ZhangResearch Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China.
Zhidong Gao *Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, P.R. China. gaozhidong6600@163.com.
Yingjiang Ye *Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, P.R. China. yeyingjiang@pkuph.edu.cn.

Funding

Peking University People's Hospital Scientific Research Development Funds RDL 2020-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe debate surrounding factors influencing postoperative flatus and defecation in patients undergoing colorectal resection prompted this study. Our objective was to identify independent risk factors and develop prediction models for postoperative bowel function in patients undergoing colorectal surgeries.

methodsA retrospective analysis of medical records was conducted for patients who undergoing colorectal surgeries at Peking University People's Hospital from January 2015 to October 2021. Machine learning algorithms were employed to identify risk factors and construct prediction models for the time of the first postoperative flatus and defecation. The prediction models were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, the Youden index, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) through logistic regression, random forest, Naïve Bayes, and extreme gradient boosting algorithms.

resultsThe study included 1358 patients for postoperative flatus timing analysis and 1430 patients for postoperative defecation timing analysis between January 2015 and December 2020 as part of the training phase. Additionally, a validation set comprised 200 patients who undergoing colorectal surgeries from January to October 2021. The logistic regression prediction model exhibited the highest AUC (0.78) for predicting the timing of the first postoperative flatus. Identified independent risk factors influencing the time of first postoperative flatus were Age (p < 0.01), oral laxatives for bowel preparation (p = 0.01), probiotics (p = 0.02), oral antibiotics for bowel preparation (p = 0.02), duration of operation (p = 0.02), postoperative fortified antibiotics (p = 0.02), and time of first postoperative feeding (p < 0.01). Furthermore, logistic regression achieved an AUC of 0.72 for predicting the time of first postoperative defecation, with age (p < 0.01), oral antibiotics for bowel preparation (p = 0.01), probiotics (p = 0.01), and time of first postoperative feeding (p < 0.01) identified as independent risk factors.

conclusionsThe study suggests that he use of probiotics and early recovery of diet may enhance the recovery of bowel function in patients undergoing colorectal surgeries. Among the various analytical methods used, logistic regression emerged as the most effective approach for predicting the timing of the first postoperative flatus and defecation in this patient population.

Indexed as

DefecationMachine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsRecovery of FunctionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsColorectal surgeriesMachine learningPrediction modelsTime of first postoperative defecationTime of first postoperative flatus

Identifiers

PMID38730406
PMCPMC11088159

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.