Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38730581›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Serum Proteomic Signatures in Cervical Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions.

Chaston Weaver, Alisha Nam, Caitlin Settle, Madelyn Overton, Maya Giddens, Katherine P Richardson, Rachael Piver, David P Mysona, Bunja Rungruang, Sharad Ghamande and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chaston WeaverCenter for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Alisha NamDepartment of Undergraduate Health Professions, College of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Caitlin SettleDepartment of Undergraduate Health Professions, College of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Madelyn OvertonDepartment of Undergraduate Health Professions, College of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Maya GiddensDepartment of Undergraduate Health Professions, College of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Katherine P RichardsonCenter for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Rachael PiverCenter for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
David P MysonaCenter for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Bunja RungruangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Sharad GhamandeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Richard McIndoeCenter for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3040-3631
Sharad PurohitCenter for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0385-3829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported 604,000 new diagnoses of cervical cancer (CC) worldwide, and over 300,000 CC-related fatalities. The vast majority of CC cases are caused by persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infections. HPV-related CC incidence and mortality rates have declined worldwide because of increased HPV vaccination and CC screening with the Papanicolaou test (PAP test). Despite these significant improvements, developing countries face difficulty implementing these programs, while developed nations are challenged with identifying HPV-independent cases. Molecular and proteomic information obtained from blood or tumor samples have a strong potential to provide information on malignancy progression and response to therapy in CC. There is a large amount of published biomarker data related to CC available but the extensive validation required by the FDA approval for clinical use is lacking. The ability of researchers to use the big data obtained from clinical studies and to draw meaningful relationships from these data are two obstacles that must be overcome for implementation into clinical practice. We report on identified multimarker panels of serum proteomic studies in CC for the past 5 years, the potential for modern computational biology efforts, and the utilization of nationwide biobanks to bridge the gap between multivariate protein signature development and the prediction of clinically relevant CC patient outcomes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebioinformaticsbiomarkerscervical cancerinflammationproteomics

Identifiers

PMID38730581
PMCPMC11083044

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.