ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Predicting Transcription Factor Binding Sites with Deep Learning.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- How negative sampling shapes the performance of transcription factor binding site prediction models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- A DNABERT based deep learning framework for predicting transcription factor binding sites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transcription Factor Promiscuity Drives Regulatory Rewiring and Evolvability in Gene Networks in Bacteria.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- DNA sequence analysis landscape: a comprehensive review of DNA sequence analysis task types, databases, datasets, word embedding methods, and language models.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- A review on the applications of Transformer-based language models for nucleotide sequence analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Trends of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use in Drug Targets, Discovery and Development: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Current drug targets · 2025Review
- The evaluation of transcription factor binding site prediction tools in human and Arabidopsis genomes.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prediction of binding sites for transcription factors is important to understand how the latter regulate gene expression and how this regulation can be modulated for therapeutic purposes. A consistent number of references address this issue with different approaches, Machine Learning being one of the most successful. Nevertheless, we note that many such approaches fail to propose a robust and meaningful method to embed the genetic data under analysis. We try to overcome this problem by proposing a bidirectional transformer-based encoder, empowered by bidirectional long-short term memory layers and with a capsule layer responsible for the final prediction. To evaluate the efficiency of the proposed approach, we use benchmark ChIP-seq datasets of five cell lines available in the ENCODE repository (A549, GM12878, Hep-G2, H1-hESC, and Hela). The results show that the proposed method can predict TFBS within the five different cell lines very well; moreover, cross-cell predictions provide satisfactory results as well. Experiments conducted across cell lines are reinforced by the analysis of five additional lines used only to test the model trained using the others. The results confirm that prediction across cell lines remains very high, allowing an extensive cross-transcription factor analysis to be performed from which several indications of interest for molecular biology may be drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.