Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38733423›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2024

Cardiovascular disease risk assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A scoping review.

Louise Murphy, Mohamad M Saab, Nicola Cornally, Sheena McHugh, Patrick Cotter

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Louise MurphyCatherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. 99928302@umail.ucc.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2349-1087
Mohamad M SaabCatherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7277-6268
Nicola CornallyCatherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0644-0026
Sheena McHughSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6595-0491
Patrick CotterCatherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-9421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Identification of at-risk patients is paramount to initiate preventive care and tailor treatments accordingly. Despite international guidelines recommending all patients with RA undergo CVD risk assessment, rates remain suboptimal. The objectives of this review were to map the strategies used to conduct CVD risk assessments in patients with RA in routine care, determine who delivers CVD risk assessments, and identify what composite measures are used. The Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines were used. A literature search was conducted in electronic and grey literature databases, trial registries, medical clearing houses, and professional rheumatology organisations. Findings were synthesised narratively. A total of 12 studies were included. Strategies reported in this review used various system-based interventions to support delivery of CVD risk assessments in patients with RA, operationalised in different ways, adopting two approaches: (a) multidisciplinary collaboration, and (b) education. Various composite measures were cited in use, with and without adjustment for RA. Results from this review demonstrate that although several strategies to support CVD risk assessments in patients with RA are cited in the literature, there is limited evidence to suggest a standardised model has been applied to routine care. Furthermore, extensive evidence to map how health care professionals conduct CVD risk assessments in practice is lacking. Research needs to be undertaken to establish the extent to which healthcare professionals are CVD risk assessing their patients with RA in routine care. Key Points • A limited number of system-based interventions are in use to support the delivery of CVD risk assessments in patients with RA. • Multidisciplinary team collaboration, and education are used to operationalise interventions to support Health Care Professionals in conducting CVD risk assessments in practice. • The extent to which Health Care Professionals are CVD risk assessing their patients with RA needs to be established.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidCardiovascular DiseasesHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansRisk AssessmentCardiovascular diseaseCardiovascular risk assessmentPatient assessmentRheumatoid arthritisRoutine careScoping review

Identifiers

PMID38733423
PMCPMC11189331

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.